Re: REPLY TO BYRON
makemyday_at_worldnet.att.net
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: caveman: "why a bris?"
- Previous message: makemyday_at_worldnet.att.net: "Re: The reason for genocide: Continued OTHER ARTICLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:03:33 GMT
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>
> makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
> >Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> >> david640@webtv.net wrote:
> >> > Like I've Stated Before; it isn't racist if it's true.
> >>
> >> Your statement isn't true. It is racist whether or not it is true.
> >> Non-raccsts don't even ask the question, since there is no more reason
> >> to look at data based on skin color than to look at data based on what
> >> day of the year you were born on, or height, or first name.
> >
> >There is just as much reason to look at race as there is for insurance
> >companies to look at the ages of auto liability or life insurance
> >applicants. Group stats tell a revealing and meaningful story.
>
> So tell us the group stats based on birthday, first name, and height.
> Don't have them? Then why did you pick race as the grouping you wish
> to look at stats for?
Because Crime, LowIQ, and OOW_Breeding correlate heavily
with race, not with birthday, first name, and height.
Although the probability of anyone with first name Tyrone or Delmar
having lowIQ, criminal record, and OOW_Kidz, is quite high...
> Answer: because you are a subhuman racist
*Wrong* answer...
- Next message: caveman: "why a bris?"
- Previous message: makemyday_at_worldnet.att.net: "Re: The reason for genocide: Continued OTHER ARTICLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
