Re: REPLY TO BYRON
From: Glad Bagz (clear_at_safe.com)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: Old Nick: "Re: Inuit were building boats in Greenland 4000 years ago."
- Previous message: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- In reply to: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Next in thread: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Reply: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Reply: Tom Shelly, White God: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Reply: Byron Canfield: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON -- KING OF SCUM SOCKPUPPET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:44:10 GMT
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in
news:dafmg09q9q6g2phi2cbo2g77jgv7dd1hsa@4ax.com:
> makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>>> makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>> >Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>>> >> david640@webtv.net wrote:
>>> >> > Like I've Stated Before; it isn't racist if it's
>>> >> > true.
>>> >>
>>> >> Your statement isn't true. It is racist whether or not it is
>>> >> true. Non-raccsts don't even ask the question, since there is no
>>> >> more reason to look at data based on skin color than to look at
>>> >> data based on what day of the year you were born on, or height,
>>> >> or first name.
>>> >
>>> >There is just as much reason to look at race as there is for
>>> >insurance companies to look at the ages of auto liability or life
>>> >insurance applicants. Group stats tell a revealing and meaningful
>>> >story.
>>>
>>> So tell us the group stats based on birthday, first name, and
>>> height. Don't have them? Then why did you pick race as the grouping
>>> you wish to look at stats for?
>>
>>Because Crime, LowIQ, and OOW_Breeding correlate heavily
>>with race, not with birthday, first name, and height.
>
> How do you know? Have you checked? let's see the data.
You've seen the data many, many times, idiot.
>
> Why did you check the data for race and NOT checked the data for the
> other variables?
There are no other variables which can explain why such things are common
in the black race in every country in which they live and at all socio-
economic levels.
You fools try to introduce other "variables" into the argument to try to
distract from the facts. The problems is that your excuses, which is
what they are and not variables, are not logically based, can't be
quantified, and can never be proven one way or another because they have
nothing to do with why black people behave the way they do.
> Because you are a subhuman racist slime, is why.
Bob, why is black crime disproporationately high from Canada to England
to Africa?
Bob, why are black people disproportionately reliant on welfare all over
the world that offers them welfare?
Why is EVERY single black nation on this earth an impoverished *** hole
of starvation, disease, and crime?
Why haven't blacks contributed anything meaningful to the world? Why is
there such a lack of technical innovation coming from black nations?
Low intelligence explains all these things. Your "variables" do not and
only obfuscate the truth--which is your only intention.
Bob, most people think you are an idiot and most people see right through
your lies. Why don't you give it up? Nobody argues with the data we
present. They just resort to name-calling which is all one can do when
presented with inarguable truth.
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
King of SCAA
>
> lojbab
Your name is Bob "Usenet's Biggest Idiot" LeChevalier, not lojbab. Why
don't you get over that stupid fake language and try entering the real
world?
- Next message: Old Nick: "Re: Inuit were building boats in Greenland 4000 years ago."
- Previous message: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- In reply to: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Next in thread: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Reply: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Reply: Tom Shelly, White God: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Reply: Byron Canfield: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON -- KING OF SCUM SOCKPUPPET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]