Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs
From: Floyd L. Davidson (floyd_at_barrow.com)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: P.Comm: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Previous message: Ashley: "Re: Lapita??"
- In reply to: stevewhittet: "Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs"
- Next in thread: Eric Stevens: "Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs"
- Reply: Eric Stevens: "Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:32:09 -0800
"stevewhittet" <whittet@adelphia.net> wrote:
>"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>>floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:
>>
>> >Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson/umiaqs/
>> >>
>> >>I like the laminated coaming strakes visible in photograph 8.
>
>Floyd has hit on a great way to ensure his posts are interesting and
>informative.
Thank you. I do make an effort at posting articles that are useful!
>> >>photograph 11 the ribs and stringers are fastened with nails or
>> >>screws. Except for the stem all of the timbers seem to be sawn.
>
>Yes. There is no sign of any of the strips being split as far as I can see
>although the wood seems to be a nice reasonably vertical grain.
>> >
>> >Screws are used, and there are few places where wood parts are
>> >lashed together. The only example I can think of are the pieces
>> >in the bow. I didn't have an pictures of that in the first
>> >batch, but I took some more today which show it.
>
>Its apparently screwed and plugged which implies plug cutters and a drill
>press.
Both of those frame are of *modern* construction, probably not
more than 10-15 years old. Of course they use plugs and take advantage
of tools like drill presses.
Actually, the Inupiat Heritage Center here in Barrow, in addition to
being a fine museum, also has a large workshop area that is used by
local crafts people for a variety of things... and working on umiaqs
is one of them.
>>>http://www.virtualmuseum.ca/Exhibitions/Inuit_Haida/inuit/fr_gallery/kayak
>1g/umiakg/umiakg.html
>> >>
>> >>illustrates the frame of an umiak molre likely to be closer to the
>> >>original.
>> >
>> >Well, it's a little hard to define just what is "the original".
>> >That boat is of a significantly different design, and probably
>> >is not from Barrow.
>
>It may be from Barrow, there is no real evidence either way except that its
>there
>I don't know if the design is modern but the construction details certainly
>are.
Make no mistake, it is *not* from Barrow. That is a Canadian
web site, and they have no need to find pictures of umiaqs made
in Barrow.
>> Probably true, but I expect Barrow does not have a monopoly on umiaks.
Eric just has to make stupid comments...
>> >It doesn't appear to have been designed for
>> >whaling, but rather for transport of people and goods. It's
>> >narrower, longer, and doesn't have a flat bottom; which appears
>> >to me to mean it would be less stable, would carry a bigger
>> >load, and would be faster.
>
>its a small boat
But it looks like a fairly large umiaq.
>> One of the recent Wooden Boat magazines has an article dealing with
>> the flat-bottomed variety and I would have cited it, if only I could
>> find the damned magazine. I cited the vessel shown in the above URL
>> simply because it seems to be made with round members rather than
>> rectangular members shaped by a saw.
>
>I'm thinking the original version might have either rectangular members
>that were split or small branches with circular cross sections that were
>bent
I doubt that prior to modern times there were many rectangular members
in either a kayaq or an umiaq.
>> >Unfortunately the *best* example of an umiaq that I know of,
>> >isn't available right now. The Inupiat Heritage Center (our
>> >local museum) has a really good example of a classic umiaq from
>> >maybe 75-100 years ago. However, when it is on display they
>> >won't allow pictures (I think that is because they don't want
>> >flashes of light hitting the exhibits, and I'm going to ask
>> >about pictures without a flash). But, worse yet, I was there
>> >early last month that it was not on display anymore. I don't
>> >know if that is temporary (it might be on tour at another museum
>> >or something, because a *huge* number of really interesting
>> >artifacts were gone).
>
>use your cell phone
What cell phone? :-)
And what good would a phone call do...
-- FloydL. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com
- Next message: P.Comm: "Re: REPLY TO BYRON"
- Previous message: Ashley: "Re: Lapita??"
- In reply to: stevewhittet: "Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs"
- Next in thread: Eric Stevens: "Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs"
- Reply: Eric Stevens: "Re: Photo Essay on Barrow's Wood Framed Skin Umiaqs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|