Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize
From: Bob LeChevalier (lojbab_at_lojban.org)
Date: 09/06/04
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Previous message: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize"
- In reply to: makemyday_at_worldnet.att.net: "Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize"
- Next in thread: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:30:55 -0400
makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
>If your parent(s) are rich successful bigtime honcho/donor(s),
>it likely means they were *smarter* (higher IQ genes which kid
>inherits) which has been the whole point of this thread...
Nonsense. Your high IQ scientists (Nobel Prize winners was your
bugaboo in a different post) are seldom millionaires, much less the
sort of multimillionaire old-money that can buy entrance into a "name"
university.
The very rich probably have above average IQs, but not likely
genius-level IQs.
lojbab
-- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: Is SCIENCE magazine 2 or more years behind; Re: Orrorin"
- Previous message: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize"
- In reply to: makemyday_at_worldnet.att.net: "Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize"
- Next in thread: Bob LeChevalier: "Re: DAFNgapz Unchanged - No Surprize"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]