Re: Why are Mexicans the dumbest and worst of all immigrant groups?

bernxard_at_yahoo.com.au
Date: 01/15/05 

Date: 15 Jan 2005 01:14:36 -0800

American Renaisance did a bid of an expose' on the myth of the Staunch
Family Oriented Mexican.

That cheap labour also has disadvantages beyond the 3-4 times higher
crime rate that mexicans bring. There is the displacement of White
children from part time jobs and the displacement of the small White
underclass from menial work and of course the displacement of the large
Black underclass from gainfull employment. These groups once had a
place or small nicche in society: a place to start from, to have
respect or to at least eek a reasonable life and spirit.

Here is a link: http://www.vdare.com/francis/heather.htm
"Hispanic youths, whether recent arrivals or birthright American
citizens," she reports "are developing an underclass culture....
Hispanic school dropout rates and teen birthrates are now the highest
in the nation. Gang crime is exploding nationally -- rising 50 percent
from 1999 to 2002-driven by the march of Hispanic immigration east
and north across the country. Most worrisome, underclass indicators
like crime and single parenthood do not improve over successive
generations of Hispanics-they worsen."
*******

Then there is the massive subsidisation of the health care system, the
provision of 'affirmitive action' to the the cost of Whites in either
higher expenses or displacement of otherwise adaquet Whites from
education and work. Becuase they are "White"

Consider the parasitc effect of the large 'diversitycrat' career crowd,
the perversion of our politicians by hispandering.

That cheap labour is starting to look expensive.

What good is having the cheapest labour? It doesn't make a great
society even for elites. The blowback is too inevitable to severe.

There are few menial tasks that can't be done better with automation.
There is not a fruit or vegetable that can not be harvested
automatically by machinary. By providing cheap often illegal labour we
displace the deployment of already existing automation that is of no
great complexity. Managers and lawyers become a little lazy, the kinds
of people that would rather hire 100 Mexicans illegally than hire a
skilled contrator or hire an engineer and a few technicians to come up
with a scheme. It encourages laziness. It encourages the development
of low paying low tech nation and industries. The Califorania orange
industry is reeling due to competition from Brazil: Brazil has better
crop harvesting automation whereas America has Mexicans.

The reason the Roman empire never developed an adcanced technological
society is because of the availabillity of cheap labour. Steam was
confined to gimmicks such as opening tempe doors.

You can buy a system for $300 US dollars to mow your lawn.

You can buy another system for a little more that

Automated Lawnmower:
http://www.friendlymachines.com/

Or a robot vacuum cleaner
http://www.ferret.com.au/articles/58/0c016058.asp

There is a better way to grow and improve our life than through the
delusional sham of 'growth' by masses of cheap low skilled labour and a
few elites that benefit.

Relevant Pages