Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)

From: Tedd Jacobs (Jacobs_at_mail.boisestate.edu)
Date: 03/08/05 

Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:30:51 -0700

<phippsmartin@hotmail.com> wrote...
> Tedd Jacobs wrote:
>> <phippsmartin@hotmail.com> wrote...
>> > Doug wrote:
>> >>I think that you don't understand the importance of context.
>> >
>> > My point was that you and Doug don't understand the meaning of
> context.
>>
>> you mean *your* meaning of "context"... please be specific when you
> are
>> writing about other people and their understanding of the concensus
> view of
>> a definition within a field for which they are quite familure.
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> You know, I don't usually address spelling mistakes but since the whole
> issue is about the proper usage of words, I find this to be a bit
> funny. :D
>
> Again, the whole point, that researchers define how terms are to be
> used WITHIN THE BODY OF THEIR RESEARCH is completely lost on these
> people who obviously haven't done any research themselves. It's sadly
> pathetic, now that I think about it.

yes, sadly pathetic indeed that you dont realize the people you are talking
with have done more research in more ways than you can begin to comprehend,
are vastly more experienced in discussing research, and are experts in their
respective field(s). what are you? a lamer that comes flying into groups
professing to know more and know better than the people who's fields they
are actually representing. google and a computer does not an expert make.

Relevant Pages