Re: Sociology of Fascism?

From: Comm (tjsrno_at_spampost.com)
Date: 03/16/05 

Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:57:44 GMT

"Norman" <inchanga@telus.net> wrote in message
news:1110954133.967182.275920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Comm wrote:
>> I have no idea
>> what's going on in South Africa
>
> Not often someone admits that.

I wouldn't believe a word the presses said about it either way. I think
this thread started with frank in sci.anthropology asking about advice for
an essay he's writing. I don't even know who the president? of SAf is now.
I do know that what the presses said about the apartheid was extremely
distorted - because two people from there told me 1. a white Boer and 2. a
Zulu.

The thing is, the F word (no, not ***, I mean FASCISM) is demonified out of
hand. What I had to say about it is true - and it's pretty simple. Someone
wants to go so far as to call it "pathological" (frank's teachers or his
books are saying that) - and that's bull***. Primate instinctive behavior
is not pathological - and that behavior can be seen to happen with humans
WHENEVER they unite AGAINST a common enemy that has trodden upon them one
time too many. Of course, when blacks unite against whites, that is "not
pathological." heh. sure.
>
> Norman
>