Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- From: "Sylvia Knörr" <Sylvia.Knoerr_NoSpam_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:17:35 +0100
"Cruise Director" <SeaFuncSpam@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1131894588.448705.141140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Does such a beast exist somewhere? Or if not moderated, at least crank
> free?
In spite of all that racist crap, I would prefer an unmoderated forum
because it represents the whole variety of opinions. If an opinion is too
flawed, we can try to remodel it, that's better than just oppressing it. If
you oppress what people are really thinking, their thoughts will pop up
somewhere else, sometimes in a more undesirable way.
> Like others who have presumably fled this forum long ago, I find the
> racist cross-posts tiresome and slightly depressing. I wish I could
> believe it was some disingenuous person trying to yank people's chains,
> but it seems far more likely to be people who really believe what they
> say. I guess we're just a bunch of biomass being programmed with
> various messages. It's disturbing, the patterns that people will
> repeat and pass on. The moreso because of their prevailence in human
> history. Man The Dominance Animal.
>
> Cheers,
> Brandon Van Every
Just be patient with us humans - as a species, we are newbies here on earth.
:-))
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- From: Cruise Director
- Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- References:
- Moderated anthropology group?
- From: Cruise Director
- Moderated anthropology group?
- Prev by Date: Re: H. floresiensis
- Next by Date: Re: H. floresiensis
- Previous by thread: Moderated anthropology group?
- Next by thread: Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- Index(es):
Loading