Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- From: "Cruise Director" <SeaFuncSpam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Nov 2005 02:52:48 -0800
Sylvia Knörr wrote:
> "Cruise Director" <SeaFuncSpam@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:1131894588.448705.141140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Does such a beast exist somewhere? Or if not moderated, at least crank
> > free?
>
> In spite of all that racist crap, I would prefer an unmoderated forum
> because it represents the whole variety of opinions. If an opinion is too
> flawed, we can try to remodel it, that's better than just oppressing it. If
> you oppress what people are really thinking, their thoughts will pop up
> somewhere else, sometimes in a more undesirable way.
You must be young enough not to be tired of the same old Usenet debates
yet. :-) Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it. And
even then, each generation must discover things anew for themselves.
Actually, what really baffles me is how old some people can get and
still hold on to their opinions mostly unchanged. I guess there's a
lot of variance in mental flexibility, and it must be to some degree
determined by environment. So then you ask, what determines the
environment, and then one starts thinking about the history of
agriculture.... the range of human misery on the Earth is profound.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
20% of the world is real.
80% is gobbledygook we make up inside our own heads.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- From: Sylvia Knörr
- Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- References:
- Moderated anthropology group?
- From: Cruise Director
- Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- From: Sylvia Knörr
- Moderated anthropology group?
- Prev by Date: Re: Reasons for apparent Technological Superiority of West over East?
- Next by Date: Re: Good intentions (Re: CATHARTIC DIGITAL DISLOCATION REINTEGRATIVE FETISH)
- Previous by thread: Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- Next by thread: Re: Moderated anthropology group?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|