Re: Norse, Vatican and Vinland
From: Inger E Johansson (inger_e.johansson_at_notelia.com)
Date: 06/11/04
- Next message: George: "Re: 'a'-'vowel' former Re: C-Essay"
- Previous message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Vatican documents known by scholars."
- In reply to: R.Schenck: "Re: Norse, Vatican and Vinland"
- Next in thread: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Norse, Vatican and Vinland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:20:51 GMT
R Schenck,
the reason why you haven't had, which more than 50 other here in group have
had, sources I refered to in files sent to you is that you haven't sent me a
private mail which I always write a return answer to check that the address
is accepted and not returned, which sometimes happen-
I always ask to be sent a private mail before I send anything on. My filter
stops mails with
virus in it. Thus you can have sent mail which I haven't had. Send me a
mail and you will have documentation. OK not the same documentation I
provided and still provides to 5 Professors(in US, Canada and Sweden) and
some Professor Emeritus, nor will I send you the documentation I send to
close friends who themselves all give me the right to refer to their studies
and/or works.
But I have a round figure of 200 references I do send to those who asks for
them. If only they send me a valid mailaddress in a mail to my private
mailbox.
Inger E
"R.Schenck" <nygdan_morteauxspam@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:8fcb1069.0406111251.2464d2e9@posting.google.com...
> Yuri Kuchinsky <yuku@trends.ca> wrote in message
news:<40C8AC88.1C3C0E6E@trends.ca>...
> > George Hein wrote:
> >
> > [Alan:]
> > > > Presumably it's the same work to which you just referred us in a
microform
> > > > version. If so, it has been ignored by serious scholars for a
century. Don't
> > > > you think there might be a reason?
> > > >
> > > The reason may be truly scientific (but then such should be at least
> > > (foot)noted. However, it might be LAZINESS, STUPIDITY, POLITICAL
> > > CORRECTNESS, PERSONAL ADJENDA usw.
> > >
> > > The same human weakness applies to theologians, philosophers,
historians
> > > and indeed scientists as well (and especially, today, TV media "news
> > > persons").
> > > Anyone who studies history would know this.
> >
> > Yes, George, that's for sure.
> >
> > As always, there's a whole chorus of those seeking to
> > dismiss uncomfortable evidence simply because it doesn't
> > agree with their preconceptions...
>
> what about more norse influence in pre-columbian america is anyone
> supposed to be uncomfortable about?
>
> Certainly no one disagrees that the norse did infact make their way
> into vinland?
> >
> > A reason can always be found to dismiss uncomfortable
> > evidence, that's for sure. Here, imagination and creativity
> > will reign supreme! :)
> >
> > If it's not written up in the Standard Reference Books then
> > it doesn't exist. That's the True Science at work!
>
> I think that the problem anyone here has with most of what inger says
> is that she doesn't provide much in the way of references.
>
> Undoubtedly there can be misunderstandings in these sorts of issues,
> but the 'oed' fiasco (where the entire multivolume gi-normous OED was
> obvuiously confused for some single volume compilation and yet she
> refused to give any sort of verifiable information) should lead anyone
> to be wary when inger talks about sources.I myself have been -offered-
> a number of sources from inger, but i haven't (and i am -not- saying
> its been enough time for me to justifiably say that that won't) shown
> up yet. And often when inger does present sources they are in some
> language that most people in this english language group don't speak.
>
> So forget about 'standard' references. Inger simply doesn't provide
> references. Think about it, has anyone here been presented with good
> references and sensible evidence and -still- insisted than inger was
> beign unreasonable?
- Next message: George: "Re: 'a'-'vowel' former Re: C-Essay"
- Previous message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Vatican documents known by scholars."
- In reply to: R.Schenck: "Re: Norse, Vatican and Vinland"
- Next in thread: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Norse, Vatican and Vinland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|