Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls
From: Inger E Johansson (inger_e.johansson_at_notelia.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Vinland bishop(s)"
- Previous message: Doug Weller: "Re: Vinland bishop(s)"
- In reply to: David Christainsen: "Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls"
- Next in thread: David Christainsen: "Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls"
- Reply: David Christainsen: "Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:01:10 GMT
David C,
I do have eyes to see. What I have seen from you here and the other times
you have tried to bring your assumptions forward is that you still haven't
got it:
You need valid arguments,
You can't lean to scholars using circle-proofs.
Nothing you have written,
nor any of the scholars you refered to,
have shown to have any valid arguments for your assumptions!
The best you have come up with is IF statements.
IF that and that are wrong then B.
what you missed is that you have to show that the IF is proven right. As you
should know your assumptions stands and falls that the 'IF' situation
happened.
You haven't shown one single factor that point in that direction. What's
worse is that when you refer to scholars you lean to you try to make believe
that the 'IF' situation is proven by an other 'what IF' clausul. This means
that you are even worse in your 'best' try than the scholars you lean to
because you haven't understood the impossibility of using two 'What IF' and
one circle argument. You have to start presenting valid arguments for each
of the 'What IF'. That you never tried to.
Inger E
"David Christainsen" <david_christainsen@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:15910715.0406190929.3d7a2036@posting.google.com...
> "Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
news:<01LAc.96333$dP1.315463@newsc.telia.net>...
> > David,
> > you had better get one thing stright from beginning,
> > you can't lean to anyone but yourself for assumptions you put forward.
> > Especially not to 'scholars' who use circle-proof and never proven
anything
> > at all by using that type of invalid arguments. Thus you have to present
> > valid arguments for your case and/or valid contra arguments for the
thing
> > you call untrue. Before you done that and shown that you can handle that
the
> > only thing you have achieved is no tell an opinion - not a theory, nor a
> > valid assumption or a valid conclusion.
> >
> > SO where are your proof without you (or the scholar you lean to) using a
> > circle-proof. What's your references, observe not works of today - what
and
> > why exactly do you(not any scholar you lean to that would be as if you
were
> > a copycat and I trust that isn't your point. Is it?) see as valid
argument
> > to be used for a theory instead of presenting this assumption of yours?
> >
> > Inger E
>
> Dear Inger,
>
> You don't have the eyes to see.
>
> Were you to do a diligent job GOOGLING our 2 Newsgroups, you would
> discover my backup viz-a-viz carbondating of the Scrolls that Vermes
> himself suggested and identification of a series of calendar schemes
> in Daniel, Apocrypha, and DSS.
>
> This work is original with Dr. Barbara Thiering, not me.
>
> If you are so interested in references, why don't you actually
> study Dr. Thiering's scholarly publications? I've published a
> list of them on some Internet Newsgroups already. Of course, were
> you actually interested in doing this, you may email me for assistance.
>
> That's the honest way to force you morally to stop attacking someone
> else about "circle-proofs".
>
> With all good wishes,
> Dave
- Next message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Vinland bishop(s)"
- Previous message: Doug Weller: "Re: Vinland bishop(s)"
- In reply to: David Christainsen: "Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls"
- Next in thread: David Christainsen: "Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls"
- Reply: David Christainsen: "Re: Public told one untruth after another about the Dead Sea Scrolls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
