Re: Pining governoer
From: Inger E Johansson (inger_e.johansson_at_notelia.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Garry Denke: "Re: 'Return Stonehenge' says archdruid"
- Previous message: Ken Down: "Re: My theory about Sumer"
- In reply to: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Next in thread: Doug Weller: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Reply: Doug Weller: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Reply: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:15:05 GMT
Seppo,
I don't get it. Tom has got a full answer and because the answer doesn't
suit his 'taste' he try to make believe that he hasn't got an answer.
Would you Seppo care to write following in a way that Tom(and other
naysayers) might be able to comprehend. Please no hard words inside this my
text:
It doesn't matter who the speaker is if what he say is accurate.
It doesn't matter if it's a schoolboy or a Professor who write a summary if
facts in it are correct.
One has to take into consideration that the former can't be expected to
present full akrebi and the later should know to do so, but it's the content
of the text and the facts within that is relevant in a summary, not who
wrote it.
In a full work it's essential to take into consideration the reason behind
it's existence. In other words: Why was the study/compiling etc done? What's
the relation between the writer and those he wrote about resp. what he wrote
about? Etc. etc. a summary doesn't have to meet that criteria. That's why we
sometimes need to write a summery of our works.
Inger E
"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
news:40DADF3B.A7DAF312@not.com.au...
>
>
> Tom McDonald wrote:
> >
> > Inger,
> >
> > Care to comment on this? You've cut it without answering or
> > acknowledging it at least twice now:
> >
> > "You haven't answered the question of why you referenced a
> > web site that sells pre-written student term papers (which are
> > nearly always purchased in order to be turned in as the
> > student's own work--i.e.: fraud) as though it supported you.
>
> Tom, do you understand the difference between the wrapping paper and
> the present therein?
>
>
> [..]
> --
> SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
> misled.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Garry Denke: "Re: 'Return Stonehenge' says archdruid"
- Previous message: Ken Down: "Re: My theory about Sumer"
- In reply to: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Next in thread: Doug Weller: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Reply: Doug Weller: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Reply: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|