Re: Pining governoer

From: Doug Weller (dweller_at_ramtops.thisremove.co.uk)
Date: 06/24/04 

Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:59:28 +0100

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:15:05 GMT, Inger E Johansson wrote:

> Seppo,
> I don't get it. Tom has got a full answer and because the answer doesn't
> suit his 'taste' he try to make believe that he hasn't got an answer.

I must have missed it then. A full answer would have to give details from
the term paper and explain why they were more important than other
potential sources.

Once again, you show that you can, after a fashion and not as well as you
think, talk the talk, but you can't walk the walk.

Doug

>
> Would you Seppo care to write following in a way that Tom(and other
> naysayers) might be able to comprehend. Please no hard words inside this my
> text:
>
> It doesn't matter who the speaker is if what he say is accurate.
> It doesn't matter if it's a schoolboy or a Professor who write a summary if
> facts in it are correct.
> One has to take into consideration that the former can't be expected to
> present full akrebi and the later should know to do so, but it's the content
> of the text and the facts within that is relevant in a summary, not who
> wrote it.
> In a full work it's essential to take into consideration the reason behind
> it's existence. In other words: Why was the study/compiling etc done? What's
> the relation between the writer and those he wrote about resp. what he wrote
> about? Etc. etc. a summary doesn't have to meet that criteria. That's why we
> sometimes need to write a summery of our works.
>
> Inger E
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
> news:40DADF3B.A7DAF312@not.com.au...
>>
>>
>> Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>
>>> Inger,
>>>
>>> Care to comment on this? You've cut it without answering or
>>> acknowledging it at least twice now:
>>>
>>> "You haven't answered the question of why you referenced a
>>> web site that sells pre-written student term papers (which are
>>> nearly always purchased in order to be turned in as the
>>> student's own work--i.e.: fraud) as though it supported you.
>>
>> Tom, do you understand the difference between the wrapping paper and
>> the present therein?
>>
>>
>> [..]
>> --
>> SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
>> misled.
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: AMA Pro Racing Rules
    ... the facts of the matter wherein Tom could have honestly thought he saw ... And the facts of the matter don't seem to matter at all to you, ... claimed that I "can't" be, I readily admit that I could be a bigot and still do that, that just because I have romantic relationships outside of my race doesn't entirely eliminate the possibility that I could still be bigoted. ...
    (rec.motorcycles.racing)
  • Re: Melted copper found Labrador dated 11th century
    ... > Inger E Johansson wrote: ... Tom, what I have observed is that YOU and your puppet master are ... denigrating the material not on any facts or theories, ... is indeed a "term paper" then it most definitely IS "vetted by the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Pining governoer
    ... For the validity of facts it doesn't matter if it's a student's paper or a ... Inger E ... > web site that sells pre-written student term papers (which are ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Melted copper found Labrador dated 11th century
    ... > Inger E Johansson wrote: ... > Tom does say he agrees with the facts presented by Kim in his paper. ... that isn't the first time he seen it. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Pining governoer
    ... Tom has got a full answer and because the answer doesn't ... It doesn't matter who the speaker is if what he say is accurate. ... facts in it are correct. ... Inger E ...
    (sci.archaeology)