Re: Pining governoer
From: Seppo Renfors (Renfors_at_not.com.au)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Fridrik Skulason: "Re: Olaus Magnus map and Hvitsark/Hvitserk"
- Previous message: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Pining governoer"
- In reply to: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Next in thread: Doug Weller: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:50:39 GMT
Inger E Johansson wrote:
>
> Seppo,
> I don't get it. Tom has got a full answer and because the answer doesn't
> suit his 'taste' he try to make believe that he hasn't got an answer.
>
> Would you Seppo care to write following in a way that Tom(and other
> naysayers) might be able to comprehend.
Ah, come on Inger..... you are asking for MIRACLES from me! I can't do
that, nobody can!
> Please no hard words inside this my
> text:
>
> It doesn't matter who the speaker is if what he say is accurate.
> It doesn't matter if it's a schoolboy or a Professor who write a summary if
> facts in it are correct.
> One has to take into consideration that the former can't be expected to
> present full akrebi and the later should know to do so, but it's the content
> of the text and the facts within that is relevant in a summary, not who
> wrote it.
> In a full work it's essential to take into consideration the reason behind
> it's existence. In other words: Why was the study/compiling etc done? What's
> the relation between the writer and those he wrote about resp. what he wrote
> about? Etc. etc. a summary doesn't have to meet that criteria. That's why we
> sometimes need to write a summery of our works.
Let me put it this way. The "naysayers" will always complain about the
quality of the writing, the qualifications of the authors, the lack of
this that and the other - whatever it takes to derail the discussion
that doesn't support their preferred establishment dogma. There is
nothing that will change that. No amount of references, citations will
do it. Further more, NONE of them do themselves what they demand of
you. Therefor they are NOT genuine to begin with.
Doug has the nerve to use this:
"Once again, you show that you can, after a fashion and not as well as
you think, talk the talk, but you can't walk the walk."
HE is one of the worst offenders against his own demands. HIS
"naysaying" is God's Word and needs no references, logic or reasoning
- it kills off all studies, sound reasoning and logical conclusions
based on actual evidence. Do you think anything will alter such a
religious POV? There is any amount of "references" in your posts -
only they don't recognise them for what they are.
As an example, you refer to "Pining" and give the year "1473" - there
are TWO references there already. You know, you can lead a horse to
water, but you cannot make them drink! So the answer is simple - let
then die of thirst!
> Inger E
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
> news:40DADF3B.A7DAF312@not.com.au...
> >
> >
> > Tom McDonald wrote:
> > >
> > > Inger,
> > >
> > > Care to comment on this? You've cut it without answering or
> > > acknowledging it at least twice now:
> > >
> > > "You haven't answered the question of why you referenced a
> > > web site that sells pre-written student term papers (which are
> > > nearly always purchased in order to be turned in as the
> > > student's own work--i.e.: fraud) as though it supported you.
> >
> > Tom, do you understand the difference between the wrapping paper and
> > the present therein?
-- SIR - Philosopher unauthorised ----------------------------------------------------------------- The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is misled. -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Fridrik Skulason: "Re: Olaus Magnus map and Hvitsark/Hvitserk"
- Previous message: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Pining governoer"
- In reply to: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Next in thread: Doug Weller: "Re: Pining governoer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|