The rabid mental defective Seppo Renfors is at it again

From: Tony Smith (adolphuzspriggs_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/26/04


Date: 26 Jun 2004 14:52:25 GMT

Seppo Renfors wrote:

> PLEASE NOTE: Tony "the criminal" Smith uses "set follow-ups to" to
> propagate messages to groups completely UNRELATED to anything it
> states - in fact there are NO groups any of its crminal stalking is
> appropriate in.

This is what a Senior Judge thinks of Sepsis's ability to truthfully
argue facts:- (See http://tinyurl.com/27lh8 for the full story)

"The employer was unrepresented both before the Court at first instance
and before me. During the course of the proceedings before him, the
learned Industrial Magistrate advised the employer that he should give
serious consideration to obtaining professional advice. This advice
apparently was not followed. Had he been properly advised, then this
matter would have been disposed off much more efficiently because much
irrelevant material and argument would not have been produced, and the
Court's attention would have been focussed on the essential issues
without the inclusion of arguments that were based upon material from
other jurisdictions which were of no relevance to these proceedings. "

>
> The stalking engaged in by Tony Smith is a Criminal Act emanating from
> raw malice, as a result of losing an debate long time ago. You may see
> him resort to copyright breaches, defamation, racism and deliberately
> and knowingly breach a number of Australian and some international
> laws. He attacks other people for no valid reason in forums where his
> sole interest is STALKING me. Variously the mentally disturbed person
> will accuse others of being me.

And what the judge thought of Sepsis's ability to state a case
factually and logically. (To which I'll add Sepsis's oft proven
tendency to lie through his teeth, especially when cornered)

"Ms. Kaukas, of counsel for the employee, was forced to deal with a
flood of paper, much of which contained material, whether it be
argument, fact or opinion, that had little relevance to the essential
matter before this Court. One could be drawn to the conclusion that the
employer was attempting to win the day by throwing up any and all
arguments that he could think of, irrespective of their merit, so that
the employee, and ultimately this Court, would reach a conclusion
favourable to the employer by virtue of the sheer volume of the
material. The diligent attempts by the learned Industrial
Magistrate,Ms. Kaukas, and ultimately, this Court as presently
constituted, to
advise the employer as to what was required of him, fell upon deaf ears.

It is well recognised that the Industrial Relations Court of South
Australia has frequently before it parties who are unrepresented. The
practice has developed of the Court, and on occasions members of the
legal profession, giving to those unrepresented parties assistance and
advice in the conduct of the proceedings, such that matters are
disposed of expeditiously and fairly, consistent with the over-riding
obligation that this Court has, to decide matters on the basis of
`equity good conscience and the substantial merits of the case'. In
this case, not only did the employer apparently ignore the assistance
and advice, but he seemed to treat it as a licence to escalate the
extreme content of his arguments to the point where Ms. Kaukas quite
properly took advice as to some of the allegations which challenged her
professional competence and probity."

>
> The EFFECT, if not the aim, is to destroy goups with its STALKING.
> Note the ever increasing volume of the stalker Tony Smith! Do not
> respond to the madman - notify the following of his criminal
> activities of stalking - the breach of AUP's and group charters:
>

And on the good old donkey's ability to stick to facts without
invention, lies and florid seppocisms:-

"Thirdly, the appeal documents were the fore-runner of a deluge of
documentation that is verbose, and much of it totally irrelevant,
despite the attempts of the Court to assist the employer. This leads me
to the conclusion that the employer had deliberately embarked upon a
course of action for reasons of personal advantage without regard as to
whether it would assist this Court or allow the employee an opportunity
of meeting whatever case the employer hoped to make out.

Fourthly, I refer specifically to the affidavit of Ms. Kaukas dated 29
July 1997 and its annexures. It is too extensive to set out in full,
and more particularly because I do not wish to repeat the nature of its
subject matter complained of by Ms. Kaukas in a public document; but I
adopt its contents as evidencing the vexatious and scandalous remarks
made by the employer. Significantly most are written and the affidavit
is therefore citing from documents on the record of proceedings. The
evidence of that affidavit alone, and my findings in relation to Ms.
Kaukas' conduct, would have been sufficient to strike out the appeal."

Given that Seppo, the drooling fool meat slapper, has now posted its
idiotic diatribe close to 300 times in the past four months, I have a
pretty fair idea how both the Senior Judge and Ms. Kaukas felt.

Dr. Gobbles is totally impervious to logic, unhindered by facts, devoid
of the scantiest attention to truth and unimpeded in any way by
rationality or intelligence. The Feldwebel blunders on, daily telling
more lies and making himself look a bigger fool every day.

The following Website contains excellent insights into the bizarre and
weird defective mental processes that drive the K00K that is Renfors:

http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

The following are particularly pertinent to Seppo (the Clown TM)
Renfors.

Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: don k00k-suit, fix bayonet
and charge!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Invent!

And of course, Renfors' credo:-

Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!

Tony Smith.
[Vote 1 Seppo Renfors for Net K00K of the Month.]



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
    ... incident, on one occasion Ming referred to the elapsed time in weeks, ... profile' in Google Groups is that stalking? ... might then choose to complain to my ISP. ... Not the employer. ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: Employment records
    ... Problem is I have no records, wage slips got slung out and of course no ... contracted to work 8hrs per day and paid for 8 hours then even though you had a break you'd have no case unless the employer reduced the break times to below statutory minimum. ... Expect to be asked, if you take them to court to sue for underpayment of wages, why you didn't pursue it to conclusion at the time. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: The Answer: Accident in lift at work
    ... As such, the employer was liable. ... although no one seems to have argued otherwise at trial so the Court ... is 'work equipment' for the reasons given by Pill LJ - this was surely ... lift is not 'work equipment' is rather like arguing that a crayfish is ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: microwave/hood vents
    ... His idea of "installation problem" was "it powers on and I hear noise ... the cost with our contractor or something, but after the $170 bill it's ... which takes them to court. ... award for not taking his employer to court. ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: Repayment of training costs
    ... A court order to deduct it from his wages? ... and an easy way of letting the new employer know ... nothing remotely easy about making a successful third party debt ...
    (uk.legal)

Quantcast