Inger Admits to Having No references

From: Steve Marcus (smarcus_spamout__at_cox.net)
Date: 06/28/04 

Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 05:23:59 -0400

The following was posted on 6/27/04:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
news:RrpDc.96988$dP1.320351@newsc.telia.net...
> Padraic,
> had you known about the politics behind the 'early' maps up to 1650 you
> wouldn't have had to ask.
> First of all there were parts which deliberately was changed when a map
was
> edited. Contrary to what was on the seacharts that in many cases wasn't.
>
> That you can see an example of in
> Mercator/Janssonius 1648 map.
> That bloob IS Alaska.

Bullshit. You have no evidence of that, Inger. Moreover, if there were any
evidence to support your pipe-dream, we wouldn't have to learn about it from
on Usenet from an idiot like yourself. It would be general knowledge.

Now, if you are any scholar at all, here's what you need to do, and what you
will do:

1. Present clear, specific evidence to support your position by citing
someone having recognized credentials.

2. Citing your anonymous (and almost certainly imaginery) friends don't
count. Bullshit such as "had you known of ..." or "you are no scholar ..."
or "what you are forgetting ..." or "I'm not allowed to say yet, but wait
until ..." does not constitute proof.

3. Citations of URLs from people who are no more qualified than you are do
not count.

If you do not support your position by presenting clear, specific evidence
from someone having recognized credentials and in doing so, and in doing so,
if you do not identy that person by name, present that person's credentials,
and tell us where we can check out what that person has written about
Alaska, then **you will have admitted that no such person, and no such
evidence exists**. It is really quite simple.

I flat out guarantee that Inger will not give us any names, credentials, or
recognizable and checkable citations of people who agree with her
allegations that Alaska appears on the map as she claims. She will not,
because she can't. Period.

<snip further obfuscation by Inger and her allegations that she presents
without a shred of proof.>
>
> Inger E
>

Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Inger has not posted any names, credentials or recongizable and checkable
citations of people who agree with her allegations that Alaska appears on
the map as she claims.

This constitutes an admission that she has no sources to support her.

End of discussion.

Steve 

-- 
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

Relevant Pages

  • Re: And yet more shiao jiao clips
    ... evidence that said credentials either don't exist or are forged. ... Mike is using to support his position. ... "another scholar in the field." ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: Celtic Origins
    ... Bohuslan and then carefully construct your definition of 'Swede'. ... I'm also claiming that in the context of what Inger wrote ... If there is evidence in Tanum province then there is evidence in ... Tanum province, and that's that. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Vanuatu archaeology
    ... Inger E ... I don't see why I should have to guess the correct search terms from ... comments referred to _Roman_ voyages to the far east. ... fact contained NO relevant evidence of the claims you were making. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Celtic Origins
    ... I'm also claiming that in the context of what Inger wrote ... >>> If there is evidence in Tanum province then there is evidence in ... >>> Tanum province, and that's that. ... At the museum in Tanum they keep the bones of the gods. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Request and information
    ... >> presenters credentials within their feild or the 'topic' feild ... By privacy information it would include ... >> that Inger refuses to substantiate claims with independent ...
    (sci.archaeology)