Re: My theory about Sumer

From: Saggiga (sag_giganospam_at_yahoo.de)
Date: 07/05/04 

Date: 5 Jul 2004 05:49:36 -0700

"JMB" <jmb@utvinternet.ie> wrote in message news:<cc9c7l$lgj$1@kermit.esat.net>...
> "Saggiga" <sag_giganospam@yahoo.de> wrote in message
> news:90e61c3.0407030315.10904362@posting.google.com...
> > "JMB" <jmb@utvinternet.ie> wrote in message
> news:<cb9m4u$4ce$1@kermit.esat.net>...
> > > "Saggiga" <sag_giganospam@yahoo.de> wrote in message
> > > news:90e61c3.0406220745.3477c64d@posting.google.com...
> > > > "JMB" <jmb@utvinternet.ie> wrote in message
> news:<2jqdbcF14p2n2U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> > > > > "Saggiga" <sag_giganospam@yahoo.de> wrote in message
> > > > > news:90e61c3.0406220049.1131cceb@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > For my theory, I use these documents : myths ...
> > > > >
> > > > > --SNIP--
> > > > >
> > > > > > Now you have it all !
> > > > >
> > > > > Yep, that just about sums it up.
> > > >
> > > > I have much more details since I have done that research for years ;-)
> > > >
> > > > I just dont understand why I could find those results, me alone, with
> > > > no money or nothing special, when SO many professors have time, money,
> > > > students and laboratories and are unable to get these results.
> > >
> > > Because they are not desperately trying to jump to conclusions that
> simply
> > > cannot be supported by myths alone. They require actual evidence, not a
> > > vague statement that **if** a certain myth actually refers to something
> > > else, and **if** it is a true story, then one **might** be able to
> conclude
> > > "X". You have taken a series of stories (and that is all they are, not
> > > prove has been provided by you that they actually happened), you have
> > > decided that they mean something that you want them to mean, and you
> have
> > > claimed this as some sort of proof. the real world doesn't work like
> that.
> >
> > No I am not trying to jump to conclusions.
>
> You might not be trying, but it is exactly what you are doing.

Sorry about that.
>
> > I build a theory with many elements, but since you dont know them, you
> > cannot understand why this theory should be correct.
>
> You have built your theory on **your** interpretation of **myths**. You
> have ignored all archaeological evidence, and you have ignored all
> linguistic evidence on sci.lang
>
Yes of course, it is my interpretation of myths.
Which archaeological evidence did I ignore ? Please name them.
In sci.lang, I asked questions : I got answers sometimes and sometimes
none... But which linguistic evidence on sci.lang did I ignore ?
Please name them.

> > I have many actual evidences. But I dont feel I should give them here
> > and now.
>
> You have no evidence. If you did, you would have presented it by now. You
> are an Inger understudy.

I am not obliged to present all my evidences. You are not obliged to
believe in my theory :-) If you want, just ignore it ;-)

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SMUs museum opens exhibit of Etruscan artifacts
    ... Maybe not in the case of the Peterborough inscriptions. ... winding up in Europe. ... unambiguous archaeological evidence for Tiffinagh-writing ... But without archaeological evidence, here ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: SMUs museum opens exhibit of Etruscan artifacts
    ... I also remember the history that was invented to make his reading of the inscriptions plausible -- an extensive and intensive centuries-long exploitation of Lake Superior-region copper deposits leading to billions of pounds of American copper winding up in Europe. ... But unless I am forgetting something, even Kelley had no unambiguous archaeological evidence for Tiffinagh-writing Northern European copper merchants. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Definition of "Medieval."
    ... archaeological evidence between the fall of the Roman Empire and the ... Anglo-Saxon evidence is abundant. ... You said the Dark ages were pre-medieval and lasted from the fall of the ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
  • Re: Archaeological dating methods, was: ARCHAEOLOGY VERSUS TACITUS AGRICOLA w
    ... Doug Weller wrote in: hbpr31lneucj4rppi1f04aikd0ct8lntu7@4ax.com, ... >> archeological evidence seems to be on topic here, ... But if possible reliable written sources are mentioning ... one can reject or doubt the archaeological evidence. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Bronze Age in the Baltic
    ... or fall on the basis of archaeological evidence for Bronze Age ... working or trading in any particular part of the Baltic. ...
    (sci.archaeology)