Re: Changes in Encyclopedia text -KRS

From: Martin Reboul (martin_at_SPAMFUKreboul1471.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 07/05/04 

Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 15:45:22 +0100

"George" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message
news:9b937279.0407041225.4b8687d4@posting.google.com...
> "Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
news:<fOOFc.4209$dx3.33308@newsb.telia.net>...
> > 25th June 2004:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensington_runestone
> >
>
> Ah. Is Inger aware that this link is rather 'in the other camp' as
> regards the authentic origins of this rock ???

Quite so George!

 I was hesitant to mention that this entry is a subsection of 'Archaoelogical
Forgeries', flanked by Piltdown Man and other magnificent pieces of mischief,
for fear of being dubbed a 'naysayer' or worse.

 Surely nobody would LIE in an Encyclopedia though - or would they?

More soon on this tacky, careworn, discredited Masonic jape - if it is really
necesssary. Surely even Yuri Suchkinky has been 'enlightened' by now?
           Cheers
                   Martin