Re: Changes in Encyclopedia text -KRS

From: Michael Zalar (m_zalar_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/06/04 

Date: 6 Jul 2004 05:18:46 -0700

"Martin Reboul" <martin@SPAMFUKreboul1471.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<ccbpgs$71l$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>...
> "George" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message
> news:9b937279.0407041225.4b8687d4@posting.google.com...
> > "Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
> news:<fOOFc.4209$dx3.33308@newsb.telia.net>...
> > > 25th June 2004:
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensington_runestone
> > >
> >
> > Ah. Is Inger aware that this link is rather 'in the other camp' as
> > regards the authentic origins of this rock ???
>
> Quite so George!
>
> I was hesitant to mention that this entry is a subsection of 'Archaoelogical
> Forgeries', flanked by Piltdown Man and other magnificent pieces of mischief,
> for fear of being dubbed a 'naysayer' or worse.
>
> Surely nobody would LIE in an Encyclopedia though - or would they?
>
> More soon on this tacky, careworn, discredited Masonic jape - if it is really
> necesssary. Surely even Yuri Suchkinky has been 'enlightened' by now?
> Cheers
> Martin

There seem to be a fair number of errors in the piece (including the
recently discussed Larsson futharks). As this is a reader created
encyclopedia, I will be attempting to clean a few thing up when I have
time.

Michael