Re: Changes in Encyclopedia text -KRS

From: Yuri Kuchinsky (yuku_at_trends.ca)
Date: 07/07/04 

Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:58:27 -0400

Michael Zalar wrote:
>
> "Martin Reboul" <martin@SPAMFUKreboul1471.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<ccbpgs$71l$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>...
> > "George" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message
> > news:9b937279.0407041225.4b8687d4@posting.google.com...
> > > "Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
> > news:<fOOFc.4209$dx3.33308@newsb.telia.net>...
> > > > 25th June 2004:
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensington_runestone
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah. Is Inger aware that this link is rather 'in the other camp' as
> > > regards the authentic origins of this rock ???
> >
> > Quite so George!
> >
> > I was hesitant to mention that this entry is a subsection of 'Archaoelogical
> > Forgeries', flanked by Piltdown Man and other magnificent pieces of mischief,
> > for fear of being dubbed a 'naysayer' or worse.
> >
> > Surely nobody would LIE in an Encyclopedia though - or would they?
> >
> > More soon on this tacky, careworn, discredited Masonic jape - if it is really
> > necesssary. Surely even Yuri Suchkinky has been 'enlightened' by now?
> > Cheers
> > Martin
>
> There seem to be a fair number of errors in the piece (including the
> recently discussed Larsson futharks). As this is a reader created
> encyclopedia, I will be attempting to clean a few thing up when I have
> time.
>
> Michael

Hi, Michael!

I see that Mr. Reboul is still continuing with his personal
defamation campaign against yours truly.

Why is he so obsessed with this subject, I wonder? He never
has much to say other than offering his unsubstantiated
opinions over and over again...

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku

"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so,
it might be, and if it were so, it would be; but as it
isn't, it ain't. That's logic!"
          -- Lewis Carroll, "Through the Looking Glass"

Quantcast