Re: Question
From: David B. (davidb_at_tronospamchos.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 07/14/04
- Next message: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Question re. Copper artifact Canadian Arctic former Re: Copper Casting In America (Trevelyan)"
- Previous message: David B.: "Re: Question"
- In reply to: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Question"
- Next in thread: Seppo Renfors: "Zolota's criminal POND SCUM is back again"
- Reply: Seppo Renfors: "Zolota's criminal POND SCUM is back again"
- Reply: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:14:58 +0100
Martyn Harrison wrote in message
<796bf0pq1vjilvfg8je06ruac7bvf0320a@4ax.com>...
>
>> http://www.trochos.plus.com/primesauce/later.htm#84
>
>What I'm getting at is the question of whether Mercator projection was
actually
>a new idea as such, or just an existing idea popularised via that name.
To the best of my recollection, the specific mathematics of the Mercator
projection (actually very slightly wrong as he drew it, but soon fixed)
were his idea. He was after all working only a generation after the very
first documented circumnavigation of the planet. Previous world maps had
been most concerned with representing the shapes of the continents, to
which end they used all sorts of exotic projections but Mercator addressed
the problem of navigation, which had gone way beyond the old portolan
techniques.
>I reckon the conical projection does have some real advantages in
estimating
>distance within a northern hemisphere ocean voyage such as an Atlantic
>crossing. In that sense, I'm wondering whether Mercator was something
nobody
>had thought of (I find this rather unlikely, although obviously it may be
the
>way of it), or whether it was adopted for some reason (and what reasons
those
>might be.)
>
>The obvious thing is it reflects an entire globe moderately well and is
>extremely easy to map lat and long into a rectangular space.
It's not just lat and long; the brilliant thing about the Mercator
projection is that it gives a good representation of directions- take a
bearing on the map and, despite the fact that you're sailing on a globe,
steering in that direction will get you pretty close to where the map says
you're headed. To do that, distances have to be sacrificed- which is why it
was a dumb idea to use the Mercator projection as a standard representation
of the world in household atlases.
David B.
- Next message: Floyd L. Davidson: "Re: Question re. Copper artifact Canadian Arctic former Re: Copper Casting In America (Trevelyan)"
- Previous message: David B.: "Re: Question"
- In reply to: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Question"
- Next in thread: Seppo Renfors: "Zolota's criminal POND SCUM is back again"
- Reply: Seppo Renfors: "Zolota's criminal POND SCUM is back again"
- Reply: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|