Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
From: Bruce Pew (vanep_at_cox.net)
Date: 07/16/04
- Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Question re. Copper artifact Canadian Arctic former Re:CopperCasting In America (Trevelyan)"
- Previous message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: bark cloth (Re: Polynesian canoes"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Next in thread: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Jul 2004 19:32:37 -0700
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote in message news:<9GDJc.23$45.4920@news.uchicago.edu>...
> In article <45534f09.0407151403.1ee1d46a@posting.google.com>, vanep@cox.net (Bruce Pew) writes:
> >mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote in message news:<isnJc.15$45.2823@news.uchicago.edu>...
> >> In article <45534f09.0407141931.bd5d6ef@posting.google.com>, vanep@cox.net (Bruce Pew) writes:
> >> >mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote in message news:<GIgJc.10$45.1614@news.uchicago.edu>...
> >> >> In article <45534f09.0407141120.431a287b@posting.google.com>, vanep@cox.net (Bruce Pew) writes:
> >> >> >mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote in message news:<Sn1Jc.46$25.6651@news.uchicago.edu>...
> >> >> >> In article <45534f09.0407131754.781cca6e@posting.google.com>, vanep@cox.net (Bruce Pew) writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > So you are
> >> >> >> >satisfied with our present leadership group for fighting terrorism?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> By and large, yes. Not all they're doing is optimal, but that's a new
> >> >> >> kind of situation and you learn as you go along. I can't point to any
> >> >> >> war where all that was done was optimal.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I'm not 'by and large'. They havn't approached optimal at any level of
> >> >> >the manuever.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Not me. I have some 'first hand' knowledge about getting shot at.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So do I.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >So you went to school on the GI Bill?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> :-)) I wasn't even born when the GI Bill was passed.
> >> >
> >> >?. It would have been hard to go to school on the GI bill if the bill
> >> >didn't exist. I was asking whether you went to Nam and then finished
> >> >your education? Maybe you get shot at in Chicago?
> >>
> >> No, at the Suez Canal.
> >
> >I don't mean to pry and will certainly accept 'no' answer. Egyptian,
> >Israeli, French, or British?
>
> Israeli. The war of 1973.
That helps me understand your position better. I think trying to
reduce terrorism on our planet is very important. My objection is with
the leadership group in the USA. I think the war on terrorism is low
on this groups agenda. Invading Iraq was high on their agenda as
evidenced by the plans for such an invasion existing long before 9/11.
Whats bothersome is the overall ineptitude of this leadership group.
They don't even understand when its best to say nothing. They remind
me of the cranks who frequent the newsgroup and profess to be experts,
when they obviously arn't, subsequently never listening to those who
are.
>
> Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
> meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
- Next message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Question re. Copper artifact Canadian Arctic former Re:CopperCasting In America (Trevelyan)"
- Previous message: Philip Deitiker: "Re: bark cloth (Re: Polynesian canoes"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Next in thread: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
