Re: Zionist or TERRORIST UNDER THE BED - Suitcase Nukes, Martial Law & Civil War

From: Qolon (telos_at_bigpond.com)
Date: 07/24/04 

Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 05:24:35 GMT

I've amplified my post because you are engaging in unjustified censure,
without being able to provide substantiation by way of proof of your
racialisms as ideology:

"The most concise definition of God in Islam is given in the four verses of
Surah Ikhlas which is Chapter 112 of the Qur'an:

"Say: He is Allah, {Nature contains Nature}
The One and Only. {Nature rejoices in its Nature}
"Allah, the Eternal, Absolute. {Nature surmounts Nature}
"He begets not, nor is He begotten. {Nature amended in its Nature}
And there is none like unto Him." [Al-Qur'an 112:1-4] {Act of Nature 'LIKE'
= 'HOMOIOS"}

The word 'Assamad' is difficult to translate. It means 'absolute existence',
which can be attributed only to Allah (swt), all other existence being
temporal or conditional. It also means that Allah (swt) is not dependant on
any person or thing, but all persons and things are dependant on Him." [by
Dr. Zakir Naik, "The Most Concise Definition of God',
<http://www.theunjustmedia.com/>]

I note from your other posts that you frequently quote the www-link
http://www.theunjustmedia.com/ which demonstrates that your political
lobbying is Muslim based rhetoric, anti-democratic, non-autonomous {autos /
ones true self, the soul + nomos / Torah} and annihilationist.

As far as attributions of Nature goes, it is the Sabbath (Saturday) by which
we may obtain our peaceful and transcendent chronological understanding of
Divine Providence as the first-ARCHE principles-STOICHEION {

ie. the elements such as the letters of the alphabet, as the rudiments,
primary and fundamental principles of any art, science, or discipline may be
considered as a paradigm, the pattern or example, a set of concepts etc.,
that are shared by a community of scholars or scientists: Telos = Arch + c²

} of the oracles-LOGION {ie. the 10 Commandments [Romans 3:1-2] of
God-THEOS" [Hebrews 5:12-14]

And this would appear to be consistent with the Natural, Regulative and
Metempirical Philosophical origin of language, it's relationship to the
theory of number and considerations as to whether a heuristic {a method of
solving problems; one for which no algorithm heretofore exists and therefore
depends on inductive (ie. some reaction within the organism) reasoning from
past experience of similar problems} exists that is attributed to a
chronological based hermeneutic as 'a priori'. It is a nomenclature known
as the traditional Great Chain of Being, body to mind to soul to spirit or
cosmic hierarchy, which had traditionally been derived as Angels from the
anagrammation of [Exodus 14:19-21].

And therefore by implication the articulation of religious belief, thought
and conscience as values expression inclusive of one's self {ie. own-IDIOS
body-SOMA} which is compliant to those principles of religious liberty
espoused by the United Nations International Covenant of Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR), but represented mathematically by a fourfold vMeme/Moment
Kabbalistic 9(9² +1)/2 = #369 Matrix {ie. HOMOIS meaning 'like, sameness'
being related to Numbers as the square 9² = 81 or the product of two equal
factors; Plato's 'ADELPHOIS NOMOIS'}, being the basis for a theological,
metaphysical philosophical and chronological retort--A 369 day chronological
and mathematical matrix known from antiquity as the Merkabah (ie.
Kabbalistic) mystical (transcendent and metaphysical) foundation for a
perennial solar/lunar [ie. 9(9² +1)/2 (#369) - 3(3² +1)/2 (#15) = 354 lunar
cycle] and organizational philosophy uniting reason and faith and mechanism
for governance as the regulative & natural philosophical principles
underpinning our Australian Constitution and legislative framework [#51,
#66, #77, #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government /#9, #72].

The metaphor that the sun and the moon are sub-ordinate to a natural,
regulative and metempirical power as transcendent principle in consequence
of Providence, is that which Philo of Alexandria 20BCE-50CE as Jewish
political and theological propagandist, was "unable to trace out accurately
[concerning] the respective natures and powers of each, therefore, [is]
reduced to silence about them." {

If Philo of Alexandria (20 BCE-50 CE) is to be regarded as a political and
theological propagandist on behalf of Judaism of later antiquity, or
Josephus (37-100 CE) as an historical revisionist, the expressions which
characterize Old Testament usage the Greek word 'Hodos' or the Hebrew word
'Derek' (German for 'Ruler') as a systematic approach to governance and
claim to Christian beliefseems not to find any empathy with them. [TDNT ©
1967, 1995 edition V:65]

} But nevertheless remains analogous with the Philosopher Plato's insight
that consciousness of God rests in reason, the supreme function of man's
spiritual life. With which he contributed to the religious philosophy of
antiquity one of its most fruitful concepts: "...that reason, in virtue of
its knowledge of virtue, also controls moral action, is made clear in the
metaphor of the helmsman. As in the microcosm, man, so in the universe there
rules as king of heaven and earth (alethinos kai theios nous). In
intercourse and marriage with pure being (to auti autos) man brings forth
nous (mind) and aletheia (truth) [1 John 5:20]." [KITTEL 1995 IV:954]

By the way, the most concise definition of God, within Islam appears
insubstantial.

The Greek word HOMOIOS meaning 'similar or like' which is often used in
parabolic mystery formulas as being descriptive of the nature of the kingdom
of heaven [Matthew 13:24-52], implies that the same equitable
power-EXOUSIAZO as autonomy over his/her own-IDIOS body-SOMA is granted to
the individual as being unequivocally equal rights pursued as the Way with
virtue and integrity [1 Corinthians 7:2-4]. That is, the term HOMOIOS means:

i) Of the same kind; like or resembling;
(1) those who have the same position and rights;
ii) Of like disposition; the same;
(1) men of the same mind or party; of the same rank or station
(2) expression of closeness of agreement
(3) one and the same
(4) the same as usual
(5) all one to us
(6) homois antapodidonai give 'tit for tat'
(7) on equal terms, in fair fight
iii) In relation to possessions, 'belonging equally in common'
(1) accruing equally to all, general
(2) approaching all equally
iv) In geometry, 'similar' of figures'
(1) of triangles in the sense of equal
(2) of numbers (the square of a number as the product of two equal factors
v) Emphasizing the agreement by which one thing is similar or equal to
another
vi) Hebrew equivalent is Mem (#40) + Yod (#10) + Final Nun (#50 / #500) =
#100 / #550 {species as one of the same nature, form, class, kind, same;
stalk of corn; him, her, it; sexual intercourse, salaciousness; feast of
dedication of a temple / Arrow; By; Aphrodite Cythereia as the Greek Goddess
associated with the planet Venus, of eternal beauty and erotic desire who
according to legend, when taken to Olympus and presented to Zeus and the
other gods. Everyone admired her and was dazzled by her beauty. She had many
sexual relationships including Zeus (Jupiter), Ares (Mars), Poseidon, her
brothers Hermes and Dionysus and mortals such as Anchises a prince of
Dardania (near Troy), as many of those who wanted her as their own wife.

According to mythical accounts given of Greek legend, Priapus was conceived
from an illicit rape and solicitations by Zeus (or Dionysus) of Aphrodite;
but Hera as Zeus' wife in a jealous rage performed an incantation on the
still pregnant Aphrodite, rendering the infant deformed by enlarged
genitalia. Priapus was the god who presided over the fertility of vegetable
crops. He was also worshipped as the protector of sheep, goats, bees, the
vine, and of all garden produce. The god depicted here in a fresco from the
ancient Roman city of Pompeii (destroyed in 79 CE -
<http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/images\priapism.jpg>) is of a
dwarfish man with oversized red genitals and wearing a Phygian cap. His
statue was set-up in vegetable plots to promote garden fertility but doubled
as a 'scarecrow' to keep away birds};

Or Kaf (#20) + Mem (#40) + Vav (#6) = #66 {like = HOMOIOS; damage, loss;
babbler as spermologist [Acts 17:16-21] or seed-picker as crow [Matthew
13:3-30; Mark 4:3-29; Luke 8:5-18]; total books in the bible}
(1) [#66, #15, #76, #25 - What's behind it all?/ Imaging the Mysterious/
#72, #10]
(2) [#51, #66, #77, #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government/
#73, #9]
(3) [#26, #10, #66, #5 - Natural Guidance/ The Function of Emptiness/ #54,
#28]
(4) [#22, #74, #56, #66 - Strategic Reversal/ Putting Oneself Behind/ #36,
#46]
(5) [#48, #55, #19, #49 - Sage's Constancy/ Trust in Virtue/ #66, #16]
(6) [#34, #65, #63, #33 - Achievable Goals/ The Virtue of Discrimation/ #16,
#66]

Among the Spartans and in other aristocratic and oligarchical {ie. where
power is vested in the few} societies, the term 'hoi homoioi' describes
individuals of the same rank or station. It is over the inscription upon the
altar to the 'agnostos theos' (Unknown God) to which the Apostle Paul
directs his defence against ridicule. Even though history fails to record
the decisive term 'Xenos' as 'stranger or an anonymous hero-saviour'
associated as the character central to the drama of the event on Mars Hill,
the Athenians serious intent is established by Jerome's (c. 347-420 CE) note
on the inscription: 'Diis Asiae et Europae et Africae diis ignotis et
peregrinis {ie. Of divine matters Asia, Europe and Africa are destitute,
being ignorant as foreigners or barbarians of the substance of things}'. But
above all it is God's answer to a serious question, like the no less
specifically oriented address by the Apostle Peter in [Acts 2:12-39]. The
Athenians, of course, ask in the sense of a religio eventualis {ie. true
religion is the result of action}, whereas Paul proclaims, not the one
unknown and true god of the philosophy of religion with all their illicit
sexual affairs and procreations embellished by mythology, but the very
different God, whom for the world is in fact a strange God in the ultimate
sense. [KITTEL 1995, V:8] "Let brotherly-philadelphia love-philadelphia
continue-meno. Do not forget-epilanthanomai to entertain-philonexia
strangers-philonexia, for by so doing some have unwittingly entertained
angels. Remember the prisoners as if chained with them, and those who are
mistreated, since we ourselves are in the body also. Marriage is honorable
among all, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God will
judge." [Hebrews 13:1-4]

The Apostle Paul therefore uses the term relating to knowing the 'UNKNOWN
GOD' within the context of the classical Greek poets: ".For we are also his
offspring. Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to
think that the Godhead-THEIOS is like-HOMOIOS unto gold, or silver, or
stone, graven by art and man's device." [Acts 17:28-29] As the basis for
his observation on the cultic view of deity given to idolatry [Acts 17:16;
Acts 19:25-28], the Godhead cannot be represented by a likeness of any
object including male and female, since it is not like gold or silver or
stone or a statue graven by the device of man. [TDNT 1998 V:187-188]

When do you think your propaganda becomes psychological terrorism?

Or do you consider that the God of the Hebrews/Greeks (et al = "And how is
it that we hear, each in our own language in which we were born? [Acts
2:5-12]) as Jews and Christians is somehow sub-ordinated by deity made of
planetary associations--Should we not regard as an anathema Baal-Poer or
Priapism worship which gives rise to forms of racialism you espouse?

- dolf
- <http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/patent.html#AXIOM4>

"Jackeroo" <Jackeroo@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
news:rVkMc.13522$K53.7581@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

Snip---------------- load of propaganda
Cutting through the ***. What you are trying to say is that:
1. I should listen only to Jews
2. read only Jewishwebsites.
3. properly brainwashed christians?

And simply what ever a muslim or non jewish site puts up is :
a untrue
b. reflects only one view.
c. I should not believe on principle.
Rubbish, I find it is quite the opposite.
Next you are quoting religion to sustain other claims?
Well if you speak for the present day Jew who has made a welter of
reparations to other Jews disgust?
Supported a Nazi goc\vernment in Israel which would deny you the support of
any self respecting God?
Well the God you affect to follow has constantly had to belabour you to keep
you inline, something you through the ages were apparently quite unable to
grasp.
And once again you do not grasp where you stand viv a vis your claimed God
and your behavior constantly alienstes any claim you might think you have on
God .

And what you show is the complete inability of Jews to move into the present
century with new attitudes which we feel provide for immensely better
government under the christian God of understanding and charity.

A concept you cannot even imagine, and is shown in your use of HAPPY
HANUKAH as a comparison for happy Christmas.Or a huge cyncal shot at
Christians?
http://www.everythingjewish.com/Hanukah/origins.htm

And no matter how much you might wish it? Or try to sell it to the christian
community, it wont stick because if there are any chosen people, you have
forgeited and the new chosen as defined by Christ are the Christians.