Re: Ogham DNA

From: Philip Deitiker (Donevenask_at_worlnet.att.net)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:06:52 GMT

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> says in
news:vom5g05f49q7tsui75qmp6eqfu6o8ekfb1@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:10:49 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> says in
>>news:p9g4g01fdkber1390ofc5vutkaifv68j34@4ax.com:
>>
>>>>What specifically was the reason for the trolling.
>>>
>>> You have made an unacknowledged snip of my text which
>>> answers that very question.
>>
>>But since the question was answered satisfactorily twice
>>before, it is abit Ingerish that you bring up a dead horse
>>for one more beating.
>
>
> That's strange. I have only anwered the question once.
>
> As soon as I naswered it you snipped my answer and then
> asked me for the answer again. I think your problem was
> that you saw that multi-faceted article as being
> significant only with respect to the DNA and failed to
> recognise that was not the reason I posted it.

Gisele gave you the answer then again, and the Skeletal remains
have nothing to do with Ogham, and the use of Ogham in the title
for the post is misleading and deceptive. 

-- 
Philip
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Mol. Anth. Group    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
Evol. of Xchrom.    
http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
Pal. Anth. Group    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
Sci. Arch. Aux      
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/

Relevant Pages