Re: Polynesian canoes Rat genes and Pacific migrations no mystery

From: Yuri Kuchinsky (yuku_at_trends.ca)
Date: 07/27/04 

Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:48:02 -0400

Peter Ashby wrote:
>
> Yuri Kuchinsky <yuku@trends.ca> wrote:
>
> > pashby@blueyonder.co.ruk (Peter Ashby) wrote in message
> news:<1ghceyh.1xb4olb1vspuwwN%pashby@blueyonder.co.ruk>...
> > > Yuri Kuchinsky <yuku@trends.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Peter Ashby wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yuri Kuchinsky <yuku@trends.ca> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Peter Ashby wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yuri Kuchinsky <yuku@trends.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Reposting the same things over and over again doesn't make
> > > > > > > > them true.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yuri.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Been looking in that mirror again Yuri? Glad to know that you
> > > > > > > are achieving self knowledge at last. Does this mean you are
> > > > > > > going to post some new stuff? Or maybe something published after
> > > > > > > 1960?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is truly an ignorant comment. I've presented all sorts
> > > > > > of evidence from after 1960.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Most recently about the Native American long distance
> > > > > > trading networks, that went thousands miles into the
> > > > > > Pacific. The evidence from 1995.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Yuri Kuchinsky <yuku@clio.trends.ca>
> > > > > > Subject: ANCIENT MARINERS: Andean-Mexican seagoing trade
> > > > > > Newsgroups:
> > > > > > sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology,rec.crafts.metalworking
> > > > > > Date: 5 Jul 2004 12:41:23 -0400
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=40e984b3%40news.nnrp.ca
> > > > > >
> > > > > perhaps you could find the passages which you understand to support the
> > > > > claim above where you imply 'thousands of miles INTO the pacific' when
> > > > > all the passage you cite says is thousands of miles along the pacific
> > > > > coast. Quite a different thing. Or maybe you thought I wouldn't be
> > > > > bothered to read it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yet again Yuri is found to be unable to properly interpret things,
> > > > > probably due to the Heyerdahl tinted specs he insists on viewing things
> > > > > through. If this is the best cite you have in favour of claims post 1960
> > > > > then its no wonder you run back to 1888.
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > Your original comment was ignorant and slanderous.
> > > >
> > > > But now you're attempting to change the subject to something
> > > > else... Nice try...
> > >
> > > I didn't think you could find a passage to support your insinuation. So
> > > instead you pretend that challenge didn't exist. So, yet again when
> > > caught hoist with your own petard you make a fool of yourself by
> > > pretending you are not hanging there, swinging in the wind.
> > >
> > > Peter
> >
> > OK, I'll play. How many miles did they go into the Pacific, according
> > to you?
>
> No Yuri, you are the one who made the claim, then when asked to support
> it cited a source which does no such thing. If you are not man enough to
> admit you got it wrong then I am not going to help you draw a figleaf
> over you rnakedness by being drawn into one of your little fantasy
> games.
>
> Peter
> --
> Add my middle initial to email me. It has become attached to a country

And I was right. The distance between Peru and California is
something like 5000 miles.

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.trends.ca/~yuku

You never need think you can turn over any old falsehoods
without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population
that dwells under it -=O=- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Relevant Pages
Quantcast