Re: The Cost of Relativity
From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Previous message: Tom Potter: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- In reply to: Erik Horstkotte: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:37:16 +0800
"Erik Horstkotte" <erikh@MAPSON.msoft.com> wrote in message
news:z7xNc.12799$Nu4.2538@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> Tom Potter wrote:
> > "Bilge" what you state above looks like a bunch of bull*** to me.
>
> *Whoosh*
-- Erik makes a good point!
"Bilge" is so conditioned to give his Gods
credit for all good things,
that he completely misses the fact,
that technology is constantly advancing
with numerous tiny steps, in numerous areas,
and that models follow, rather than lead technology,
and that the best models are computer algorithms,
with logical control loops , feedback and data statements,
and are NOT open loop, complex, non-cost-effective sky models.
-- Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Previous message: Tom Potter: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- In reply to: Erik Horstkotte: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]