Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Previous message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Kirsten Seaver's Vinland Map book- first thoughts"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:44:44 +0800
"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
news:Idq6rCD5diCBFwvJ@baesystems.com...
> In message <2mnaaaFlv16qU1@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> >
> >I must emphasize that
> >"lines of force" mean
> >**lines of force" **,
> >not lines of direction.
>
> Is anyone collecting these?
Have you heard of Google?
As can be seen,
the poster tries to create the perception that
the assertion is incorrect,
and that he knows why?
I suggest that folks in the know,
don't play silly kid games,
but they address dichotomies
directly and forthrightly.
I will be happy to debate the point in question
with the poster if he thinks he capable.
-- Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Previous message: Inger E Johansson: "Re: Kirsten Seaver's Vinland Map book- first thoughts"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
