Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror
From: Mark Tarka (mark_tarka_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Kirsten Seaver's Vinland Map book- first thoughts"
- Previous message: Tom Potter: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- In reply to: hanson: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Next in thread: hanson: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Reply: hanson: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jul 2004 08:58:12 -0700
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:<LclOc.2899$9Y6.2897@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:2mscahFq40q2U1@uni-berlin.de...
> > "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
> > news:2iPNc.1124$9Y6.533@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> instigated in his
> > > sermon in news:2mn7u6Folai5U1@uni-berlin.de...
> > > > The people who instigate...,
> > > > get other folks fighting,
> > > > and they profit from it.
> > > > Tom Potter
> > >
> > > [hanson]
> > > ahahahaha,..... Yo, Tom........good to see you and
> > > your gems here again. So, your instigators actually
> > > "get other folks fighting"......AHAHAHAHahhaha...
> > >
> > > The question now is: "Who are the REAL halfwits here?"
> > > If the instigators had no willing audience to execute their
> > > instigations then the instigators would stop instigating,
> > > wouldn't they. You, being an old peddler, who by definition
> > > is an instigator, should be familiar with this MO pattern.
> > > Now, what are you going to do about it, besides crying
> > > over this ancient and ongoing human condition?
> > >
> > > Not to disturb you too severely, Tom, try to take this post not as
> > > an instigation but as any other "-gation" of your own choosing.
> > > OTOH I will admit to you that since our last post exchange I was
> > > elsewhere for the sole purpose of instigating, and I INSTIGATED
> > > big time. I won't tell you what I instigated about but it was
> > > fun and highly PROFITABLE.
> > >
> > > How will you begin your retort with now?
> > > [_] "the poster make a good point...."
> > > [_] "it is interesting to see...."
> > > [_] "as can be seen...."
> > >
> > > ahahahaha........ahahahanson
> >
> > [X] "it is interesting to see...."
> > that hanson got out on early parole.
> > Tom Potter
> >
> [hanson]
> My, my, ....Tom you are nasty, out right nasty, and very
> low class to start a game like this, right at the outset ...
> So, let me give you a second chance & ask you again:
> = = If the instigators had no willing audience to execute their
> = = instigations then the instigators would stop instigating,
> = = wouldn't they. You, being an old peddler, who by definition
> = = is an instigator, should be familiar with this MO pattern.
> = = Now, what are you going to do about it, besides crying
> = = over this ancient and ongoing human condition?
> Did you simply have no answer to this question which is the
> central theme, the hard core, of almost all your posts?
> What gives Tom?
> Why did it evoke in you such a nasty low class response?
> ......ahahaha.....ahahahaha......ahahahanson
Mr. Ahahahanson, the solution is unremarkably
clear (otherwise, it wouldn't be a solution,
right?).
Tom is from the "girly" side of life's equation.
"Instigation" is to the girly, as nucleons
are to the atom. Pretty fundamental stuff.
Wanna attack Iran, nutcase (now, is it
"nutcase" or "nut-case")?
Mark (He got the orgasm; she got the wet spot.
All else derives therefrom. A new UT?
Let's discuss :-)
- Next message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Kirsten Seaver's Vinland Map book- first thoughts"
- Previous message: Tom Potter: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- In reply to: hanson: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Next in thread: hanson: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Reply: hanson: "Re: Ultimate Victory In The War On Terror"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|