Re: Kirsten Seaver's Vinland Map book- first thoughts

From: Tom McDonald (tmcdonald2672_at_nohormelcharter.net)
Date: 07/30/04


Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:04:38 -0500


[top-posting repositioned]

Inger E Johansson wrote:

>
> "Tom McDonald" <tmcdonald2672@nohormelcharter.net> skrev i meddelandet
> news:10gl3s77ft7tla9@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>[top-posting repositioned]
>>
>>Inger E Johansson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"David B" <tronospamchos@tesco.net> skrev i meddelandet
>>>news:5KnOc.44$9S5.40@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Erik Hammerstad wrote in message <2mu4f8FqriffU1@uni-berlin.de>...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>David B. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>:-) (but isn't that a different conference?)
>>>>>
>>>>>The Vinland Map was a session at the "Dynamics of Northern
>>>>>Societies" conference, see program end of day 4.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks again Erik- not one of my brainier evenings there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>David B.
>>
>>
>>>David B and Erik H,
>>>how about following up the very latest regarding the Vinland Map? Guess
>
> you
>
>>>have missed:
>>>http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/jhm/arch/vinland/vinland.htm
>>>
>>>For full information follow ALL references presented by Hu.
>>>
>>>Inger E
>>
>>Inger,
>>
>>David B. posted this yesterday:
>>
>>"Situation so far summarised on Primesauce at:
>>http://www.trochos.plus.com/primesauce/sources.htm#86
>>
>>David B."
>>
>>Follow ALL the references presented in Item #86.
>>
>>Then apologize to David B. for saying he missed Hu's page.
>>
>>--
>>Tom McDonald
>
>
> > Tom,
> I have seen what David has posted.

Inger,

        If you have seen what he posted, then you know you were wrong
to say that he hadn't seen Hu's page that you gave a link to.
You know that David gave that same link yesterday when he gave a
link to his own web site. If you followed all the links, not
just the link to David's web site, but to the further links in
Item # 86, you would have seen that David linked to precisely
the same page as you did; only he did it yesterday, *before* you
accused him of not seeing it.

        A simple 'I was wrong' from you would set the matter to rest.
I doubt that you will be that gracious and honest, but you can
prove me wrong with a simple, 'I was wrong about David not
having seen Hu's web page, the one I provided a link to today'.

        Are you up for it?

<snip things not relevant to this narrow issue>

-- 
Tom McDonald


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Alignments of the Newport Tower
    ... responding to something that isn't part of the subject line. ... David B later comments on another page on my web site. ... responding to David B via Inger. ... Penhallow is." ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Alignments of the Newport Tower
    ... responding to something that isn't part of the subject line. ... David B later comments on another page on my web site. ... responding to David B via Inger. ... Penhallow is." ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Alignments of the Newport Tower
    ... responding to something that isn't part of the subject line. ... David B later comments on another page on my web site. ... responding to David B via Inger. ... were discussing Penhallow's qualifications to discuss the Plowden ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... Inger E Johansson wrote in message ... ... >David B, ... people within walking distance of the Runestone site by 1870, some 2,000 of ... involved in the geological dating of the stone has asked the question: ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kirsten Seavers Vinland Map book- first thoughts
    ... >I have seen what David has posted. ... It's either a pamphlet or an essay. ... It's a waste of time giving Inger lessons in correct English, ... >those on the Vinland Map. ...
    (sci.archaeology)