Re: St Nicholas Chapel former Re: MS 991 unexpected impact in contactseastward.

From: Seppo Renfors (Renfors_at_not.com.au)
Date: 08/03/04 

Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 08:13:17 GMT

Doug Weller wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message news:<410E5313.5EB1158@not.com.au>...
> > Alan Crozier wrote:
> > >
> > > "Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
> > > news:rbqPc.6998$dx3.42626@newsb.telia.net...
> > > > Doug,
> > > > you are funny. You don't present argument or contra-argument to what I
> > > > wrote.... and you believe that your funny question dealing with females
> > > > AFTER St Patrick had started his mission in Ireland should be answered....
> > > > You are more than funny and I honestly wonder if you have studied History
> > > > and or Religion at all on University level. Archaeology? might be you
> > > > studied but definitely not History or Religion.
> > > >
> > > > You have a tendency to lean to popular works instead of facts and Prime
> > > > sources. Your choice. Not mine nor any other serious scholar or interested
> > > > person.
> > >
> > > Inger. please stop insulting Doug with your implications that you are
> > > somehow a better academic than he is.
> >
> > He isn't an "academic" - hell a wet SPONGE is more qualified as
> > academic than HE will ever be.
>
> Unlike either you or Inger, I actually was an academic -- tenured no
> less. Your ravings and lies don't change that.

So you ADMIT to the truth of my statement - then instantly proceed to
tell lies. Typical......

> > > You yourself have a tendency to rely
> > > on secret, unnamed or lost sources and you refer to weirdo websites for
> > > support. When you *do* read primary sources you usually misunderstand them.
> > > Remember that this whole discussion started when you tried to imply that a
> > > bishop of Orkney was present at treaty negotiations after the battle of
> > > Maldon. There was not a shred of evidence for that in the primary source.
> > > You simply mistook the archbishop of Canterbury for someone else. As usual,
> > > instead of admitting yet another mistake you try to bluff your way out of
> > > it. You are fooling no one (except possibly Seppo).
> >
> > Oh dear..... such a long sighed person... he can see all the way to
> > the tip of his own nose!! You dopey bugger Alan, you have been sucked
> > in by Doug once more! Can't you see you are being manipulated? Doug is
> > totally OFF TOPIC and a bloody TROLL - he is at his well known
> > practise of derailing an argument to a place were he will again attack
> > the person. Don't be a FOOL and let yourself be led around by the
> > bloody nose all the time. You know what, you have made sure he has
> > succeeded...... make sure you get a pat on the head from him too,
> > won't you....
>
> Inger raised the subject of the role of women in the early Celtic
> church.

She did not! That is your personal delusion.

> It happens to be a subject of interest to me, and since she
> raised it I have every right to pursue it.

Of course you have - START YOUR OWN THREAD if that is your burning
desire!

The text you posted, was NOT following the discussion at hand, and
then you DEMANDED your side tracking be responded to.... was that with
or without the clicking of heels? The text wasn't even about "Women's
role in the church" as you now pretend!!

> You have every right to
> say I'm off topic and trolling, but no one will believe it who read
> what Inger wrote about women.

I read the post you replied to - it did NOT deal with women in the
church even though the word "female" was used in passing. The point
was about Christianity existing BEFORE St Patrick.

> > Oh, and if you have something to say to me, SAY IT YO ME - don't
> > trample and climb up on other people and use them as your dunghill to
> > crow from. Be a MAN, not a coward like Douggie, and deal with ME
> > directly - IF you have some little girlie bitch about me. Your petty
> > little BITCH seems to be that *I* don't find it necessary to abuse
> > Inger, like you do.
>
> What's all this about 'be a Man' and 'little girlie bitch'? Looks
> like combination of macho male supremism and homophobia, so no
> surprise there.

It is a description of those cowards like you who dare not deal
directly with a person and go around making derogatory comments behind
their back. BTW, what happened, did the Cowards Castle wall fall down
for you.... perhaps you were leaning on it too heavily when peeking
over the wall to see what I was saying to you? Oh, and go look up the
meaning of the words you have used in the last sentence - you don't
have a clue what they mean, and that is bloody obvious too! 

-- 
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: www.annika1980.com. Read about The Lies and criminal acts of Bret Douglas
    ... By anybody you mean yourself, Bret Douglas, Mark Morgan and Charles ... You four zealots are the only people Doug has any quarrel with. ... The details of Bret Douglas's threats, lies and criminal activities ... their criminality. ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
  • Re: Enviroloons attack train in Yorkshire
    ... Doug wrote: ... you're a proven liar who won't even admit his lies in the face of ... See for example your admission that the photographs of the ill-looking ... similar hypocrite is a casual poster and not a fixture. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: The first Swedes + seed
    ... >> expression would be used while in the vicinity of the church. ... But where did we mean by southern Canada? ... Doug Weller -- exorcise the demon to reply ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: OT Dmac rubbish Re: [SI] Rulz change proposal - Request for comments
    ... The man who doesn't even recognise the dishonesty inherent in employing ... (BTW - insults which compare you to inanimate or unpleasant objects are not "lies". ... Prove me wrong Doug. ... Address the multitudinous lies and gratuitous insults you perpetrated in the "walking pano" debacle, ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Party Against Petrol! - Saturday 21st April
    ... You really need to learn to remember your lies Doug, ... increasingly stupid as time goes by. ... defending layer and layers of lies and mis truths. ...
    (uk.transport)