Re: Who has read Seaver's new book on the Vinland Map?

From: Martyn Harrison (nospam_at_spammers.of.the.world.unite)
Date: 08/09/04 

Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:52:24 GMT

Apparently on date Mon, 09 Aug 2004 05:56:45 GMT, "Inger E Johansson"
<inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> said:

>Tom if you or Philip continue your abusive ways here, I will ask US
>Officials to make it clear for you that You have violated International as
>well as US laws. As for Philip I know he already has been told so. He will
>be told so once again.

Inger threatens to NetKop Tom, and is going to NetKop Philip.

For those who do not know what this disgusting and repellent practice is, it is
where you lose the actual argument with the people you are supposedly debating
with, and instead seek to remove their objections by removing their ability to
post again.

The strategy is to invent offence at something the other posters have said. If
their ISP is not clued up and believes they have some reason to act on
complaints (whereas, they make money from their customers and not from the
NetKop) then they may send email to warn their customer or cut their feed.

The Net Kop wins the argument, because their ISP ignores complaints about them
(usually from extensive prior experience) so the opposing poster stops being
able to post anything, while the NetKop can then Crow about how their ISP
"agreed with them". And how "they must have been abusing me" as otherwise, why
would their ISP have acted? Ignoring the fact that there was a complaint that
usually wasn't investigated properly.

This is a particularly effective strategy when conducted by an ignoramus
against a professor. The ignoramus is worthless and is ignored by AOL or
whoever, in Inger case Telia will not care about her at all.

Whereas, the professor's university will take it all seriously. Hence,
ignorance wins when NetKopping is being used.

Inger, the ignorant witch, knows this threat has some fear for some. Judge her
harshly, it isn't a mistake, she is NetKopping to avoid honest sharing of
information to bolster her pathetic and discredited usenet existence. It's the
same with Seppo and Eric, they use the same tactics and publish this in their
posts.

Yuri / Whittet are apparently harmless kooks. On account that they don't
NetKop. There's a moral in there somewhere.