Re: the Celtic Church vs. Rome

From: Paul Murray (paul_at_murray.net)
Date: 08/23/04 

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 07:47:10 GMT

In article <ux2Wc.101490$dP1.355943@newsc.telia.net>, Inger E Johansson wrote:
>> Paul Murray wrote:
>> > In article <1gfci0hctrekh5qsqkmntu5mv1idqtl0pm@4ax.com>, Terrell D Lewis
> wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:28:36 GMT, Paul Murray <paul@murray.net> wrote:
>> > >>In article <_npVc.101347$dP1.354885@newsc.telia.net>, Inger E
> Johansson wrote:
>> > >>> Alan,
>> > >>> Telia's lawers and telia's internet deny that anyone of them could
> have
>> > >>> given you permission to brake the laws!
>> > >>> Contrary to your abusive false information ALL say same as I do -
> you are
>> > >>> braking PUL and Copyright when you cut and paste in my message to
> the group.
>> > >>> THAT's against the law. What one also pointed out was that the
> minuit you
>> > >>> move my name from my top posted message that minuit you also have
> committed
>
> only those who have had the pleasure of a good tutor learning them
> Philosophy and argumentation technique can be expected to know how they are
> supposed to present contra-arguments and analyse premisses if they object to
> presented facts, figures, theories etc.

You haven't presented any facts. You have stated that Alan is breaking the
law. A statement is not a fact. My tutors taught me that if I make a claim I
need to be able to demonstrate what facts I am relying upon, and what
logical steps I have applied to get from those premises to my conclusion.

You have provided neither the original premises nor any logical steps.

You have accused Alan of breaking the law, but you have not provided any
evidence that this is true, and when Alan has presented the response from
Telia calling your claims absurd you have ignored it.

> Since the abusive naysayer in
> question hasn't been able to present any contra-arguments against my line
> nor any analyses of premisses needed for his objections, I find it hard to
> believe that we can expect any proof from his pen. Nor do I believe that he

In our previous discussion about public domain works, I presented lots of
references to prove your position incorrect, and you failed to answer.

> has taken himself time reading all the references I have sent the groups
> over the years. So why should we assume him to have done so in this case? Of

What has what you have posted over the years about history got to do with
your mistaken interpretation of copyright laws? I don't believe I have ever
commented on your historical position one way or the other.

> course I can be mistaken but it's up to him to prove his assumption,
> theories or present valid contra-arguments for mine - if he can't well than
> he blown his case!

You have accused someone of breaking the law. it is up to you to provide
evidence of this.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tchiowas utter ignorance on everything
    ... Wage Law created the Middle Class. ... It's only your sick mind that is dreaming I am. ... I speak facts, you speak ideology. ... They fared worse before the minimun wage law was passed. ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: OT: Regarding honesty and honor part 2 - Was- Re: Apple sued over LCD screens
    ... someone has broken the law - even outside of a court of law? ... The facts show that I never disagreed with the premise of ... The presumption of innocence is not absolute. ... I never had any disagreement with anyone looking at something and making ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Silvers "Controls" Dont Work
    ... I have proven you wrong with facts that you continue to ignore. ... Lott is an economist at the University of Chicago Law School who last ... Olin fellows are funded by the ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Stop lying Dan Christensen
    ... Due to recent law changes he is a bit safer now, ... using Cuban data from Cuba's submission to the millennium goals achievement and the value of imports one arrives at the same figure reported by the WFP. ... You can't refute the facts reported by the WFP and others. ... I will take their word over your lies any time. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Tchiowas utter ignorance on everything
    ... unsubstantiated by facts, article about the poor not being poor. ... below the poverty level, *NOT* middle class. ... They fared worse before the minimun wage law was passed. ... Is this really what you understand of economics, ...
    (soc.culture.thai)