Re: OT but essential Cut, paste and moving text isn't quoting

From: Martin Reboul (martin.reboul_at_SPAMFUKvirgin.net)
Date: 08/24/04 

Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 02:23:26 GMT

"Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
news:_rtWc.1298$d5.9918@newsb.telia.net...
> Martin,
> the thing is that I as every other living person on this Earth have the
> right to 'personal integregrity'!
>
> No matter what you think of me, you have to accept that and you are hereby
> warned according to the advice the Official here today told me to say to
> you(and others) that such personal attacks and abuse of yours below will be
> forwarded to your State's Official Department. You see it turned out that
> your behavior is illegal and criminal. Stop your personal attacks!

Nothing personal in a little friendly, good advice sweetie. I'm quite sure the
authorities in any country will see it that way. In the unlikely event they
don't, I shall refer them to Google Groups and some of your nonsense last year -
then we shall see who started it!

Please ask 'The Official' in question to contact me. I shall be pleased to
co-operate with the 'State Department' in any way at all, but I can promise you
this - they will be left in no doubt whatsoever of my personal integregrity.

Yours is another matter - don't forget, it's all down in the records!
                        Cheers
                                 Martin

PS I don't think badly of you Inger, other than you are often very silly. Others
have not been so generous.

>
> Inger E
> "Martin Reboul" <martin.reboul@SPAMFUKvirgin.net> skrev i meddelandet
> news:HWsWc.274$Vl4.251@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
> >
> > "Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
> > news:1QjWc.101545$dP1.356463@newsc.telia.net...
> > > Alan,
> > > you did deliberatly change my message. That's not quoting. You cut,
> paste
> > > and moved my text implying what I answered to this here and that here.
> You
> > > don't have the right to do so. Of course you have the right to chose
> which
> > > questions you answer to - so have I! That's why I top post.
> > >
> > > Neither you or anyone else has the right to violate personal
> integregrity by
> > > delibratly cut, past and move a person's text as if the person had
> answered
> > > on parts here and parts there when the person has top-posted to a full
> post
> > > instead of given part-answers which at least I chosen not to when
> writing
> > > top-posts. That you are braking 9546EG law that protect every EU-citizen
> > > against violation of personal integrity is only one of all the laws you
> have
> > > chosen not to act according to!
> >
> > The thing is Inger, you have no 'personal integregrity' - that's the
> problem.
> >
> > I'm afraid that as long as you are so agumentative, silly and annoying,
> people
> > are always going to take the piss out of you - that's the way it goes. You
> can
> > bleat forever about unfairness and illegality, it will not matter a jot.
> >
> > As I said to your sad, foul tempered and repulsive henxman Seppo the Clown
> a few
> > hours ago, it's your own fault. Stop whining and start posting sense... I
> know
> > you can. If you don't, you will be a laughing stock forever.
> >
> > > Copyright law is one other, PUL is a third and since you let it stand
> > > Inger.... wrote above a text you 'top-post corrected' then you also made
> a
> > > forgery of my origin text trying to make believe that I did write
> answering
> > > to of you chosen parts - which DID change my message content, context
> and
> > > intention. So you did delibratly. That you have no right what so ever to
> do.
> >
> > You are wasting your time... as am I probably. Get over it!
> > Cheers
> > Martin
> >
>
>

Loading