Re: KRS - Possible news to come

From: Inger E Johansson (inger_e.johansson_at_notelia.com)
Date: 09/04/04 

Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:06:50 GMT

"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> skrev i meddelandet
news:mfhkj0lo3glddor5mqdgfq8gfgl5t0s9uj@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:11:15 GMT, "Martin Reboul"
> <martin.reboul@SPAMFUKvirgin.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Inger E Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@notelia.com> wrote in message
> >news:bW_Xc.1761$d5.13136@newsb.telia.net...
> >> Eric,
> >> no you haven't missed anything David B has missed a lot.
> >> He obviously missed that the Larsson papers value has been reduced to
zero -
> >> and never will be able to rise again. First of all their value was
obscure
> >> to start with - even those who put them forward said that they must
have
> >> been copied from something - WELL what they didn't do was checking said
Mr
> >> Larsson's background. You see the rune lines of 'his' existed in his
> >> homeyard exactly when the so called specialist Linguist say they
didn't.
> >> Actually they were written down in late 15th century and edited mid
16th.
> >> That edited work only exists in one single copy here in Sweden - but
the
> >> interesting thing is that they existed in guilds in Sweden in the time
> >> between - same false written type as Larsson had. Observe that neither
the
> >> rune lines of Larsson nor the 16th century editon had same text as
exists on
> >> KRS stone.
> >>
> >> Larsson's paper has no value what so ever to do with KRS stone. AND
what's
> >> worse for David B and Martin is that they missed to do their homework -
the
> >> person they are trying to nail never made it to Kensington area before
the
> >> stone was found. No matter what story he might have tried to tell he is
> >> documented to be in a jail the time they dream of.
> >>
> >> Both David B and Martin also missed that we know exactly what happened
to
> >> the stone after it was found. But they aren't trusted with that
information
> >> as it seems.
> >
> >Ahem, I think not Inger!
> >
> >You see, only a year ago, you yourself were volubly and repeatedly
insisting
> >thet these runes *could not have been known to anyone*.... do you now
wish to
> >retract that statement?
> >
> >I knew very well it wasn't true, never mind common sense telling everyone
such a
> >blanket assertion was ridiculous. I'm glad you admit that he 'copied
them', as
> >it would have been quite a coincidence if he just made them up for fun.
>
> As far as I am concerned, the argument is not that the runes were not
> known to anyone in the 19th century and that it therefore could not
> have been carved at that date.
>
> The argument was that the claim of virtually all of the experts of the
> day that the KRS had to be a forgery because of the presence of at
> least 12 erroneous and anomalous runes which the experts of the day
> described as errors of an attempted forgery by an amatuer.
>
> I always considered the views of all of the experts to be the
> consequence of mere sloppy scholarship but it maybe now there is a
> more sinister explanation. If one or two of the first experts to
> review the KRS (and maybe some of the later experts) recognised the
> runes as secret masonic runes, they may have (a) jumped to the
> conclusion that it was a recent masonic forgery and (b) done their
> best to suppress it by a process of denigration.
>
> Wouldn't it be strange if the KRS eventually turns out to be genuine
> and in the process wide-spread attention is drawn to secret masonic
> runes which previously very few people outside masonry knew anything
> much about?
> >
> >You surely must by now know what they were to do with, and why he was
copying
> >them along with the Masonic code? On the same *** of paper indeed...
> >
> >You must also realise that means this knowledge was widely spread, by an
old and
> >well established mechanism, that certainly (NB *certainly*!) extended to
> >Minessota. Mr Larssen was very naughty for leaving them lying around as
he did,
> >but I'm very glad he did, as far from 'having no value' as you so
arrogantly
> >(and stupidly!) proclaim, he unwittingly provided the last nail for
sealing the
> >coffin of the KRS - and made you look a right idiot as a delightful
bonus!
> >
> >Now be a big girl, take it on the chin, find some grace and admit it -
you were
> >WRONG!
>
> Not yet. Wait until the information about the age is available.

Part of it is.

Inger E
>
>
>
> Eric Stevens
>

Quantcast