Re: KRS - Possible news to come
From: Tom McDonald (tmcdonald2672_at_nohormelcharter.net)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Kaimanawa Wall once again..."
- Previous message: Qiwi: "Re: Polynesians and Formosans (was: Kaimanawa wall)"
- In reply to: Eric Stevens: "Re: KRS - Possible news to come"
- Next in thread: Eric Stevens: "Re: KRS - Possible news to come"
- Reply: Eric Stevens: "Re: KRS - Possible news to come"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:34:20 -0500
Eric Stevens wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 21:12:13 +0200, Erik Hammerstad
> <egeha.is.all.you.need@start.no> wrote:
<snip>
>>And according to the Swedish geochemical investigation the
>>lineations needed more than a hundred years to develop, so they
>>were not caused by the three the stone was found under.
>
>
> That's interesting. What is your source for this?
>
> It may also mean the tree was more than 100 years old. It seems
> unlikely but not impossible.
Eric,
You are forgetting the various witness statements.
<snip>
-- Tom McDonald
- Next message: Seppo Renfors: "Re: Kaimanawa Wall once again..."
- Previous message: Qiwi: "Re: Polynesians and Formosans (was: Kaimanawa wall)"
- In reply to: Eric Stevens: "Re: KRS - Possible news to come"
- Next in thread: Eric Stevens: "Re: KRS - Possible news to come"
- Reply: Eric Stevens: "Re: KRS - Possible news to come"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|