Re: KRS - Possible news to come

From: Philip Deitiker (Donevenask_at_worlnet.att.net)
Date: 09/17/04 

Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:51:33 GMT

"a.spencer3" <a.spencer3@ntlworld.com> says in
news:Mhz2d.157$Rz2.51@newsfe1-win.ntli.net:

> Unless you deliberately like to attract abuse - and there
> is a psychological condition that encompasses that - I
> therefore assume you cannot. Other people do *not* like
> being called liars and abuser, you might be surpised to
> hear. As you will shortly discover.

Before this spirals out of hand, while it may not be your fault
what Inger says, it is your fault what you say. And while it may
not be damaging to you what you say, it is damaging to those who
might want to say something if they fear you might say it to
them. THERE IS NOTHING that one can do about kooks on the
UseNet. If you want to go for her ISP be my guest; I might even
send corroborating information that I have collected; however,
lets be clear, the proper action for dealing with Kooks is to
ignore them, collective ignorance is the be best way to
neutralize their affects on a group and to also neutralize their
false accusations.
  The proper decision to make is to ask the question, is this
person of right mind (not of right thinking, but of right mind)?
And if the person is not of right mind, can you make the person
of more right mind by arguing with them or accusing them? You
cannot. Can you make them stop making false accusations by
arguing with them? You cannot. Can you make them sane by arguing
with them, chances are you will drive them 'more' insane.
Therefore, is there anything to be gained by arguing with them.
No. Everything you say is true, as I warned you what she was
going to do before she did it, however, it is clear to everyone
here that she has no ability to control what she puts out or how
she responds to people, and the predictability of her responses
toward you can be offered as proof. Therefore it is not as if
she consciously lied to you, it is as if she cannot but lie to
you, and since this is the case what is the good of conversing
with her to begin with? 

-- 
Philip
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Mol. Anth. Group    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
Evol. of Xchrom.    
http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
Pal. Anth. Group    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
Sci. Arch. Aux      
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... it is your fault what you say. ... >> person of right mind (not of right thinking, ... >> of more right mind by arguing with them or accusing them? ... but the Inger as pet troll has the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... "Philip Deitiker" wrote in message ... > person of right mind ... > of more right mind by arguing with them or accusing them? ... Alan Crozier ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Drowning them in facts (Re: A Warning From Warmonger)
    ... Simmons has apparently lost his mind. ... futility of *arguing* on the Internet (before it was hijacked by ... Mind you, I do not think answering 'Sound of Thunder' was a good idea. ... agreeing about the same 'facts' might lend those 'facts' more ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Man takes photos of girl, 9
    ... >>> arguing that the state of mind of itself can be a crime, ... >>> must be considered indecent if viewed by itself, ... > makes a diffrence to whether a photograph is or is not indecent. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Asian Expansions and Peruvian Food Culture
    ... >>quite possible that it was that one of these anchors may have ... >>been the one I had in mind when I made my original comment. ... Mol Anthro http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/ ... Evol. ...
    (sci.archaeology)