Re: Complementary info for my research re. Norumbega

From: Michael Kuettner (miksbg_at_eunet.at)
Date: 09/17/04 

Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:25:04 +0200

"I E Johansson" <ingerxjohanssonx@telia.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:r5p2d.103495$dP1.373024@newsc.telia.net...
> In January 1997 Alex

Alex who ?

> sent me an indexlist of the early maps that Davistown
> Museum(?) had listed and such. From January 1997 up to now I have had
> approximate 100 maps carthographed up to 1644 sent to me from several
> scholars in US and Canada.

Scholars like you ?
Part-time employed teacher for religion ?

> Most of them as images some I lost when I have
> had computer-crashes(more than one)

A computer specialist who loses data because of a
computer crash ?

> but all I have in printed versions. To

Who does no backups but prints everything ?
You're a moron.

> the maps I which I have been working with I can add the seacharts up to
1550
> I have received from US, Canada, England and Scotland. I have knowledge of
> more than 100 more to which I will have access later on.
>
Nice for you. Want to buy a bridge ?

> Add to that all the Prime Sources I have read, analysed = compared with
> other Prime Sources + linguistic compared origin text with translated
> versions + analysed using both postitivistic and holoistic analyse
> methods.

"postitivistic" ? A follower of the Czech school ?
And "holoistic" ?
Having a hole where your brain should be ?
Oh, btw - you've misspelled "anal methods".
You couldn't analyze your way out of a wet paper bag.

> Those Prime sources I have checked against the maps drawn up to the time
> each Prime source was written.
>
Since your Latin is shitty to non-existant, it can only mean that you
were "positively holoistic", ie. : "It's this way because I believe so and
I have a hole between my ears where my brain should be".
And it's still "Primary sources", you moron.

> I have read too many works.

And you've understood not a single one.

> Except from a few I have found gaps which I up
> to now haven't been able to understand how any scholar writing a work can
> miss to fill.

The gaps in your education ?

> There are however some real good works. To them I will return in
> 'background
> for Norumbega discussion-part 4' at this very moment I am putting together
> a long list(some quotes most referenses without quotes) which needs to be
> taken into consideration when Norumbega and or early Greenlander's
> settlement in NA are up for discussion.
>
Not another "What I did on my holidays" - essays.
Try to get a job instead of posting trash here.

> A lot of the documents, including copies of originals, copies of
> excavationreports and some other information including maps have been sent
> to me to be used in my manuscript but not to be sent to the groups.

That's nice.
So just *** off and keep your conversation restricted to email.

> I have had lots of help and tried to help the scholars I have private
> discussion with in return.

And ? Did they get fired, too ?

> There is a large change, a paradigm chance underway. It
> includes studies on herbs, artifacts and many other areas. I will not
> discuss this here in group any further. Only wrote this lines as an
> information for those of you who don't are among us who share information
> before it's presented to the public.
>

Nice.
Why don't you learn English and history while you are on the dole ?
Those of us who don't are among you want to know.