Re: Complementary info for my research re. Norumbega

From: Seppo Renfors (Renfors_at_not.com.au)
Date: 09/18/04 

Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 02:31:20 GMT

Tom McDonald wrote:
>
> I E Johansson wrote:
>
> > Tom,
> > bull*** on yourself!
> > You are a naysayer and on top of that abuse me below as well as in the past.
> >
> > Inger E
>
> Johansson,
>
> Present the paper. Stop all this nonsense posting ahead
> of presenting the paper itself. If you write the thing
> properly, we can evaluate it on its own merits, with the
> references you provide in the paper itself.
>
> I am not now, nor have I ever been, a nay-sayer. I want
> factual evidence and cogent presentation of the argument. Give
> me that, and I'll evaluate it neutrally. I'm asking you to put
> your paper where your mouth is, and stop this silly build-up.
>
> Just do it, Johansson.

Tom, I have read all your posts from Fri 12:21 pm to Sat 6:52 am (as
shown on my screen) - a total of 8 messages. Seven posts are
completely uninformative - most are Inger bashing in nature. In ONE
single post you regurgitate a URL INGER published originally and that
was the sole "contribution" again. One thing is certain EVERY ONE of
your posts are totally negative and of nil value nowadays. You are now
most definitely in the category you deny being in - the "nay-sayers"
running on auto rant. 

-- 
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quantcast