Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine
kenney_at_cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: I_ E. Johansson: "Re: Question Greenland Greenlanders 1456"
- Previous message: a.spencer3: "Re: Question Greenland Greenlanders 1456"
- In reply to: Seppo Renfors: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Next in thread: I_ E. Johansson: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Reply: I_ E. Johansson: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Reply: Seppo Renfors: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
In article <415CE46F.3CB6F7DF@not.com.au>, Renfors@not.com.au (Seppo
Renfors) wrote:
> without going to all that trouble
> of pretending first??
If she ever gives a clear unambiguous reference I can get it checked
by professional archaeologists or historians, independently of anyone
posting to SHM or SA. My eldest brother is Christopher Young a
director of English Heritage in charge of advising overseas
organisations. He is also an archeologist. However I am not going to
ask him to wade through a load of ambiguous references which may or
may not have any bearing to the matter in question.
As for my comments on Inger misunderstanding, I have personal
experience of that. Information she has sent me shows a clear
misunderstanding of the data. She certainly seems to think that a
method of measuring latitude can be used to determine longitude.
So far in my experience, Inger has failed to post the ISBN number of
a dictionary she claims to keep by her computer, avoided naming any US
institute with pre-Columbian European items though she did claim
several museums held them and failed to name the Spanish Explorer
whose diary she claims as a source. There are other examples but these
will do. As a result, I have formed my own opinion of the reliability
of her posts. She can change this opinion, by posting clear
references, which are checkable from independent sources.
> So why
> don't you just join the long conga line of suckholes spewing a
> constant stream of abuse at Inger, without going to all that trouble
> of pretending first??
Why don't you try presenting logical arguments instead of insulting
people. Resorting to abuse is unlikely to convince me of anything.
Ken Young
kenney@cix.co.uk
Maternity is a matter of fact
Paternity is a matter of opinion
- Next message: I_ E. Johansson: "Re: Question Greenland Greenlanders 1456"
- Previous message: a.spencer3: "Re: Question Greenland Greenlanders 1456"
- In reply to: Seppo Renfors: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Next in thread: I_ E. Johansson: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Reply: I_ E. Johansson: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Reply: Seppo Renfors: "Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|