Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine

From: I_ E. Johansson (ingerxjohanssonx_at_telia.com)
Date: 10/01/04 

Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:09:23 GMT

kenney,
I have offered you, not once but several time to have information appart
from the ref. lists I have been sending here since January 1997. My only
request is that you keep what you got outside the discussiongroups. We are a
lot here who shares information, For your eyes only, or in private networks.
We respect the request not to give out details or discuss this or that in
the groups before the one working with it say it's ok. I don't doubt that
your brother is respectable - he has a good reputation. Unfortunatly for
you, you aren't him.

Inger E
<kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk> skrev i meddelandet
news:cjk3fi$jrt$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
> In article <415CE46F.3CB6F7DF@not.com.au>, Renfors@not.com.au (Seppo
> Renfors) wrote:
>
> > without going to all that trouble
> > of pretending first??
>
> If she ever gives a clear unambiguous reference I can get it checked
> by professional archaeologists or historians, independently of anyone
> posting to SHM or SA. My eldest brother is Christopher Young a
> director of English Heritage in charge of advising overseas
> organisations. He is also an archeologist. However I am not going to
> ask him to wade through a load of ambiguous references which may or
> may not have any bearing to the matter in question.
>
> As for my comments on Inger misunderstanding, I have personal
> experience of that. Information she has sent me shows a clear
> misunderstanding of the data. She certainly seems to think that a
> method of measuring latitude can be used to determine longitude.
>
> So far in my experience, Inger has failed to post the ISBN number of
> a dictionary she claims to keep by her computer, avoided naming any US
> institute with pre-Columbian European items though she did claim
> several museums held them and failed to name the Spanish Explorer
> whose diary she claims as a source. There are other examples but these
> will do. As a result, I have formed my own opinion of the reliability
> of her posts. She can change this opinion, by posting clear
> references, which are checkable from independent sources.
>
>
> > So why
> > don't you just join the long conga line of suckholes spewing a
> > constant stream of abuse at Inger, without going to all that trouble
> > of pretending first??
>
> Why don't you try presenting logical arguments instead of insulting
> people. Resorting to abuse is unlikely to convince me of anything.
>
> Ken Young
> kenney@cix.co.uk
> Maternity is a matter of fact
> Paternity is a matter of opinion

Relevant Pages

  • Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine
    ... > of pretending first?? ... As for my comments on Inger misunderstanding, ... I have formed my own opinion of the reliability ... references, which are checkable from independent sources. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Answer to Tony Smith
    ... > by several here over the years for US, Australian ... Inger he was asking who was convicted. ... Paternity is a matter of opinion ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine
    ... > As for my comments on Inger misunderstanding, ... > references, which are checkable from independent sources. ... >> constant stream of abuse at Inger, without going to all that trouble ... You resort to a lot of mindless demanding of references, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Question Greenland Greenlanders 1456
    ... > I haven't same thing that happened yesterday as happened more than 10 times ... >> What was his name Inger? ... There were a lot of Spanish explorers, ... >> Paternity is a matter of opinion ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS lake
    ... the dating in the Kensington area was not ... This is, of course, the same excuse that Inger used about four ... "I gues you better learn a bit more about Geology. ... And no references that support her claims. ...
    (sci.archaeology)