Re: Question Greenland Greenlanders 1456

From: Martin Reboul (martin.reboul_at_SPAMFUKvirgin.net)
Date: 10/03/04 

Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 20:32:05 GMT

"David Holiman" <dcholiman@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:4315ddc6.0410012315.6302c22f@posting.google.com...
> "Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote in message
news:<edk7d.2776$TY2.1690@lakeread04>...
> > "I_ E. Johansson" <ingerxjohanssonx@telia.com> wrote in message
> > news:SC97d.4629$d5.36575@newsb.telia.net...
> > > David H,
> > > instead of trying to tell lies about me in your abusive style below, you
> > > would have don't better trying to get hold of the Vinland Bibliography -
> > if
> > > you had you would have found Prime sources to read as well as works.
> >
> > You are a liar. You haven't found any Prime sources that mean what you
> > allege they mean.
> >
> > > Among
> > > those Prime sources I found one which lead me to the other which I am
> > > working with -NO SECRET DOCUMENT - It's only for you to order the
> > > Bibliography and take yourself time to go thru it. Many pages to go thru -
> > I
> > > would have expected you to at least read thru the Bibliography had you
> > been
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > a serious scholar.
> >
> > You're a liar, and a fraud.. If you had found this wonderful, nonsecret
> > source, you could simply cite it, and make all the "naysayers" look silly.
> > The fact that you allege that it's a nonsecret source, but you refuse to
> > cite it, is conclusive proof that you have no such source.
> >
> > > But of course you have to have the dinner served on the
> > > table with a voice telling you where to look for the beans and where the
> > > meat is! :-)
> > >
> > > Inger E
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Thrice: you are a liar. How simple to prove me wrong; simply post the
> > nonsecret source which supports your claim. You won't because you are a
> > fraud and a liar; there's no such source.
> >
> > Steve
> > --
> > The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
> > because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
> > should not be construed as either. This posting does not
> > represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
> > view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
> >
> >
> > > "David Holiman" <dcholiman@ev1.net> skrev i meddelandet
> > > news:4315ddc6.0410010126.61617c9b@posting.google.com...
> > > > "Inger E Johansson" <ingerxjohanssonx@telia.com> wrote in message
> > news:<jwN6d.4532$d5.35578@newsb.telia.net>...
> > > > > kenney,
> > > > > I told you all - you will have to wait for his name. I haven't looked
> > around
> > > > > for a copy or an edition of his diary and found just one, here in
> > > > > Gothenburg. Every single time I give a ref I better have arranged for
> > me
> > to
> > > > > have the special work, document or Prime Source for the next three
> > weeks. If
> > > > > I haven't same thing that happened yesterday as happened more than 10
> > times
> > > > > this year will happen - I will have to give up a source which I am
> > working
> > > > > with. AND that within 5-6 days after I sent the ref to this group or
> > > > > soc.history.medieval..... That I don't like to do before I have done
> > what I
> > > > > set out to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > Inger E
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > <kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk> skrev i meddelandet
> > > > > news:cjfvgd$qsj$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
> > > > > > In article <iky6d.4456$d5.34748@newsb.telia.net>,
> > > > > > ingerxjohanssonx@telia.com (I E Johansson) wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > and in a diary from 1533 a Spanish explorer ref to Greenland and
> > > > > > > say that many moved from Greenland to NA in 1456.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What was his name Inger? There were a lot of Spanish explorers,
> > none
> > > > > > of whom got farther north than Mexico.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > before I let you all know explorer and title.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now why do I think that the explorer and the diary do not exist? If
> > > > > > you can not give his name I am sure you can post the name of
> > whatever
> > > > > > pier reviewed journal the diary has been submitted to. A discovery
> > of
> > > > > > that importance must have ben written up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > By the way, please define latitude and longitude, the definitions
> > > > > > will be in the dictionary you claim to keep by your computer, which
> > I
> > > > > > think you have failed to post an ISBN number for.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ken Young
> > > > > > kenney@cix.co.uk
> > > > > > Maternity is a matter of fact
> > > > > > Paternity is a matter of opinion
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > Well there you are. She wins every time because
> > > > there are secret and unique documents and maps
> > > > in Gothenburg
> > > > that exist nowhere else in the academic world.
> > > > She is excused from revealing the primary sources
> > > > because it is a drive of several hours to the
> > > > repository, depending on traffic. Not to mention
> > > > childcare and teaching obligations. I think there
> > > > is a deep disappointment and resentment that the
> > > > Nordic Vinland and Greenland colonies failed to
> > > > take root, whilst the English, French, and Spaniards
> > > > made good in the New World. I share her dismay.
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Inger scolds David H (snipped)
>
> Steve calls Inger thrice a liar (snipped)

Only thrice? I didn't think he was that new to the groups!

Quantcast