Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine

From: Seppo Renfors (Renfors_at_not.com.au)
Date: 10/06/04 

Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:25:36 GMT

kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>
> In article <415CE46F.3CB6F7DF@not.com.au>, Renfors@not.com.au (Seppo
> Renfors) wrote:
>
> > without going to all that trouble
> > of pretending first??
>
> If she ever gives a clear unambiguous reference I can get it checked
> by professional archaeologists or historians, independently of anyone
> posting to SHM or SA. My eldest brother is Christopher Young a
> director of English Heritage in charge of advising overseas
> organisations. He is also an archeologist. However I am not going to
> ask him to wade through a load of ambiguous references which may or
> may not have any bearing to the matter in question.

Ahhh.... a "director of English Heritage" is not a a worthy bit of
wall paper to wave about at all in respect of matter NON English.
>
> As for my comments on Inger misunderstanding, I have personal
> experience of that. Information she has sent me shows a clear
> misunderstanding of the data. She certainly seems to think that a
> method of measuring latitude can be used to determine longitude.
>
> So far in my experience, Inger has failed to post the ISBN number of
> a dictionary she claims to keep by her computer,

UHU..... and I'm well aware of that off topic bogus beat up and
misrepresentations with false claims made..... yeah, I remember it
well, it had absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand then
either or now for that matter. It was just another pack of mongrels
attacking Inger as their "sport" because they have no other life.

> avoided naming any US
> institute with pre-Columbian European items though she did claim
> several museums held them and failed to name the Spanish Explorer
> whose diary she claims as a source. There are other examples but these
> will do. As a result, I have formed my own opinion of the reliability
> of her posts. She can change this opinion, by posting clear
> references, which are checkable from independent sources.

You are under the misconception that you are owed a response of the
kind you approve off. Who died and made you god? She can post (or NOT
post) whatever information she likes. It is entirely up to her. It
does NOT justify resorting to abusing her.

You also made these rather overbearing comments: "If information has
to be kept secret it is not worth having. In fact if you are not
prepared to put that information to public scrutiny I refuse to
believe it is worth anything." In another post you say: "As possible
Norse settlement in the Americas is a minor interest to me, I am not
going to go to great efforts to check out claims." so what the hell
are you bitching about if you have no interest? You go on to say: "I
am not prepared to keep any emails you send me as confidential." Yet
you are demanding that information but refuse to adhere to conditions
for receiving it.

Why do you believe yourself to be such a superior being that you can
DEMAND another conforms to your wishes/decrees/orders but you can
totally ignore and disregard requests from you?? She isn't your slave
you know, but you insist on treating her as if she is - just like that
"long conga line of suckholes spewing a constant stream of abuse at
Inger".

> > So why
> > don't you just join the long conga line of suckholes spewing a
> > constant stream of abuse at Inger, without going to all that trouble
> > of pretending first??
>
> Why don't you try presenting logical arguments instead of insulting
> people. Resorting to abuse is unlikely to convince me of anything.

How can a factual observation be "abuse"?

Then again perhaps abuse is something exclusive to your god like
"status" you have allocated yourself?

You resort to a lot of mindless demanding of references, but don't
like those provided demanding different ones - then after having
wasted people's time on such, you engage in a 'tag-a-long' with the
"long conga line of suckholes spewing a constant stream of abuse at
Inger" who have nothing better in to do in life than that. It is
totally non-productive and has nil value.

As the observed result has been the same several times over, my
comment was merely a helpful hint, it reduces the waste of bandwidth
and is readily recognisable as a poster who's messages are not worth
reading.

Of course you COULD resort to providing information yourself, instead
of attempt to ride on another's skirt tails. 

-- 
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 29th May information KRS
    ... references which have been sent to the group more than once. ... IT'S A SHAME ... THAT YOU DOUG STALK AND ABUSE ME WHEN YOU HAVEN'T READ REFERED SOURCES EVEN ... I meant to add that it is a shame that Inger isn't ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: a question for inger
    ... > Seppo Renfors wrote: ... on Inger in a manner the changes to her e-mail are irrelevant - I have ... you should abuse those who CAUSES her NEED to change e-mail addresses. ... Show me your "God given rights" to abuse others!! ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS lake
    ... the dating in the Kensington area was not ... This is, of course, the same excuse that Inger used about four ... "I gues you better learn a bit more about Geology. ... And no references that support her claims. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Esther Rantzen: Fear of paedophiles is harming children
    ... I am all for the tackling of abuse but not in the way that it is currently done. ... The current system was introduced through hysteria and is driven forward and expanded through more hysteria and, just like all the other hysterical panics we have had, it does simply does not address the real problem. ... Now, the job is already mine before the references are taken up and, if and when they take up references the pawprint of the next door neighbour's dog and a person I shared a coffee with in 1928. ... The convictions are not a bar to being cleared but it was enough to stop him from continuing as a slalom and white water coach. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine
    ... Inger E ... > may not have any bearing to the matter in question. ... I have formed my own opinion of the reliability ... > references, which are checkable from independent sources. ...
    (sci.archaeology)