Re: Pyramidable

From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 10/09/04 

Date: 9 Oct 2004 14:31:23 -0700

qakare@hotmail.com (Qakare) wrote in message news:<dad05270.0410090632.61555a56@posting.google.com>...
> grapheus@www.com (grapheus) wrote in message news:<337ae51f.0410082346.7dc4b54a@posting.google.com>...
> > This is one of the best DOGMATIC reasoning I've even read !...
> > Qakare considers as "PROVEN" a theory which is not, but as UNPROVEN a
> > theory which has DEFINITELY shown to be the ONLY CORRECT ONE !!!!
>
> Hi Faucounau.

AND ALWAYS THE SAME OLD TRICK, A LIE REPEATED AGAIN AND AGAIN, a
DIGRESSION made in order to AVOID a SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION about the
PROOFS that the Proto-Ionic Decipherment of the Phaistos Disk *IS THE
ONLY CORRECT ONE* !!!

> This type of error can also
> be found in your books.

"My" books !.. ALWAYS THE SAME OLD TRICK, a LIE repeated AGAIN AND
AGAIN, a DIGRESSION made in order to AVOID a scientific discussion
about the Phaistos Disk's problem !..

>For instance you

"you" !.. ALWAYS THE SAME OLD TRICK, a LIE REPEATED AGAIN AND AGAIN, a
DIGRESSION made in order to AVOID a scientific discussion about the
Phaistos Disk's problem !

> published the values for
> signs like a turtle or a owl, which does not exist on the Phaistos
> Disk.

Lastly !.. A remark concerning the Proto-Ionic Decipherment of the
Phaistos Disk !...

These are "reconstitution" of OBLITERATED SIGNS from the traces left
in the clay... Of course, these reconstitutions CANNOT be said to be
SURE... But, FROM the TRACES, they are PERFECTLY PLAUSIBLE. So,
saying that these signs "have not existed" is a GRATUITOUS and
RIDICULOUS ASSERTION as long as there is NO DEMONSTRABLE IMPOSSIBILITY
for them to have existed.
This is a NEW EXAMPLE of the WAY DOGMATICS act : NOBODY CANNOT KNOW
whether these reconsctructions are correct or not. And J.F. - a true
scholar - has NEVER WRITTEN that they are 100% SURE... But DOGMATICS
like you DON'T HESITATE to AFFIRM that THEIR ideas are TRUE, even when
they have a 50% chance or more to be WRONG !...
As I said, there is NO WAY to convince a DOGMATIC. But one can
demonstrate WHAT a kind of DOGMATIC he is by pointing up his BASELESS
ASSERTIONS.

grapheus

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pyramidable
    ... > DIGRESSION made in order to AVOID a SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION about the ... > about the Phaistos Disk's problem!.. ... No necessary to repeat it again and again. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Pyramidable
    ... >> DIGRESSION made in order to AVOID a SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION about the ... USING ALWAYS THE SAME OLD TRICK, a LIE REPEATED AGAIN AND AGAIN in ... What a GENIUS YOU ARE, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: .Java File Error
    ... > Many editors, whether Java-specific or not, are ... >this can be very handy if you'd rather not count ... Another way to avoid this kind ... I wish SCIDS learned the trick I use in JDisplay to use variable size ...
    (comp.lang.java.help)
  • Re: You need him more than he needs you!
    ... Then you can avoid talking about him ... That'll do the trick. ... Lol! ... Turtill probably started this thread. ...
    (uk.people.disability)
  • The solution to the greedy "middle companies"
    ... IF people want to avoid the gross markups ... America or Europe, the trick is to form a ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)