Re: Meteoric and Cometary impacts in historical times - Hard Evidence

From: Martyn Harrison (nospam_at_spammers.of.the.world.unite)
Date: 10/19/04 

Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:18:38 GMT

Apparently on date Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:52:00 GMT, Joe Jefferson
<jjstrshp@mindspring.com> said:

>Eric Stevens wrote:
>>
>> The problem with saying that such things have never happened is that
>> statistics show that earth should experience a Tunguska-like event
>> about once a century on the average. Such
>> events have happened, about two thirds have happened at sea but there
>> should have been a number over inhabited land during historical times.
>> Analysis shows that there should also have been a number of events
>> similar to the one which created Lake Chiemsee. The apparent absence
>> of reports cannot be attributed to there being nothing to report.
>
>Eugene Shoemaker calculated that a Tunguska-like event should occur
>about once every three centuries, not once a century. So in roughly
>6,000 years of recorded history we should expect there have been about
>20 such impacts with no more than 6 or 7 hitting on land. For most of
>human history the majority of the Earth's surface was very sparsely
>populated. And even if somebody was in the right place to see something,
>chances are they didn't know how to write. The bottom line is that it
>wouldn't surprise me at all if Tunguska was the first event of this size
>ever to be noticed by people able to record what they had seen.
>
>Interestingly, Shoemaker also estimated that meteors arrive about once a
>year with a force equivalent to about 20 kilotons of TNT. And yet these
>Hiroshima-size events are rarely reported outside the local area where
>they occur. (Admittedly the explosions generally occur very high in the
>atmosphere and, so far as I know, nobody has ever been hurt by one.)

Sounds about right.

I reckon I go with impacts being entirely possible but the archaeology has to
support this. I'm yet to be aware of any genuinely convincing sites, in
historic impacts and the fact is that there does not happen to be any confirmed
human casualty from meteor impact, just a dog in Egypt and 99+% of the
indigenous populations from the KT.

This is the tendency of rocks coming from outer space, they will usually be
either not particularly important, or will wipe out almost all life on the
surface of the planet. In between is fairly unusual.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/sa/SAIRC/1997/50.html

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Meteoric and Cometary impacts in historical times - Hard Evidence
    ... >>6,000 years of recorded history we should expect there have been about ... Shoemaker also estimated that meteors arrive about once a ... rain in the Chiing-yang district. ... There have been several reports of larger impactors in the twentieth ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Why you should review your medical records
    ... substance abuse", now that every doc is wired to every other doc, has the ... "history of substance abuse" unless I can get them to stop writing ... In researching this further I've come to the conclusion that the doctor is ... probably not the one who has been writing these reports. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Shiny new thread for Tony
    ... It reports ... history. ... The Noahic Flood event did occur. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Meteoric and Cometary impacts in historical times - Hard Evidence
    ... The apparent absence ... > 6,000 years of recorded history we should expect there have been about ... There was an event in the jungles of Brazil a few years after Tunguska. ... Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Meteoric and Cometary impacts in historical times - Hard Evidence
    ... >> of reports cannot be attributed to there being nothing to report. ... >6,000 years of recorded history we should expect there have been about ... >wouldn't surprise me at all if Tunguska was the first event of this size ...
    (sci.archaeology)