Re: Spirit Pond, Maine

From: Eric Stevens (eric.stevens_at_sum.co.nz)
Date: 10/23/04 

Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:03:59 +1300

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:08:39 GMT, Philip Deitiker
<Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> wrote:

>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> says in
>news:ghijn01ib52jodqrk56ek783ahc3hoanfo@4ax.com:
>
>> Good God - you are dense.
>>
>> I was not making the point that the book was a sham. I was
>> making the point that Steve Marcus's claim that the book
>> was "peer reviewed" was a sham.
>
>While I don't like to use this word. Eric, that is a lie, you
>made a specific comment that sought to undermine the credibility
>of the book and secondarily you paraphrased that comment in an
>answer to me.

Quote what I said. Then I will tell you why you are wrong.

Go on.

I dare you.

Hint. You are not going back to the root of the argument. You are
talking about something which cropped up later.

Eric Stevens