Re: One reason why KRS and other Norse artifacts isn't accepted genuine.

From: Steve Marcus (smarcus_spamout__at_cox.net)
Date: 11/07/04 

Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:44:45 -0500

"Inger E. Johansson" <ingerx_.xe.johanssonx@telia.com> wrote in message
news:aufjd.121168$dP1.412673@newsc.telia.net...
>
> "Day Brown" <daybrown@hypertech.net> skrev i meddelandet
> news:418d7feb$1_1@127.0.0.1...
>> Inger E. Johansson wrote:
>> > Tom,
>> > some persons read the Holy Bible as if a non-believer should have read
> it.
>> > Some read other things still without understanding. You have shown
> before
>> > that you haven't grasped that there is full documentation for what I
>> > written. No matter that I am normally send ref.lists(which I have for
>> > everything but you many times asked for all over again).
>> > If you can't read the quote and associate that to the Quebec case which
> I
>> > send the group last year, well that can be understood if you have
> forgotten.
>> > But you don't need to be so sarcastic. Do you? You know I am defenitely
> not
>> > alone on this. If you have killfilled me or not, your problem. You
>> > don't
>> > have to write abuse in an answer even if you don't like my writing.
>> I dont have a dog in this fight Inger. But given that we already know
>> that the Vikings went all the way to the Caspian Sea, why would we not
>> think they could cover the much shorter distance from their Icelandic
>> culture to Minnesota?
>
> Well there is those scholars who claim that mooring inside a mooring hole
> found under almost 2 meter sedimentary layer approx 5 meter above today's
> waterlevel in a creek of a river from Hudson Bay(it's true and I can send
> you copies of article via snailmail if you want me to) must be from 1700's
> or 1800's century....... well in other cases same group of scholars claim
> that the waterlevel hasn't changed much the last 1000 years.....

That's because "some scholars" have heard about the Hudson Bay Company, know
about the history of exploration of Hudson Bay on behalf of the Company,
know about the fact that they built stockades on rivers leading into the Bay
and wintered their ships in those rivers. See, for example, "Voyages of
Delusion: The Quest for the Northwest Passage", which gives a good account
of such matters in language simple enough for you to understand. Other
"scholars" are merely seeking to confirm pre-Columbian European visits to
North America and/or are simply seeking to confirm that Scandinavians were
running all over North America before Columbus arrived, so they twist
everything they can to confirm their personal biases.

We know what camp you are in....

<snip the balance of Inger's usual twaddle.>

>
>
>>
>> Spepticsm maybe. Buy a claim of impossiblity seems irrational.
>>
>>
>> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==----
>> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
>> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----
>
>
Steve 

-- 
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3