Re: Egyptian Chronology
From: Eric Stevens (eric.stevens_at_sum.co.nz)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Eric Stevens: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Previous message: Eric Stevens: "Re: Scholarly dishonesty - Re: The Bat Creek Stone Revisited"
- In reply to: Alan M Dunsmuir: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Next in thread: Kendall K. Down: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Reply: Kendall K. Down: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:27:22 +1300
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:10:44 +0000, Alan M Dunsmuir
<alan@moonrake.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <6441580d4d.diggings@diggingsonline.com>, Kendall K. Down
><webmaster@diggingsonline.com> writes
>>Indeed, but where do you put that ring in the sequence you are building
>>up? That is where, from time to time, C-14 dating is used.
>
>By using many overlapping samples, you build up a complete sequence of
>patterns from the present day back (in some cases in NW Europe) to about
>5,000 BCE.
>
>No need for C14 at all.
Quite the reverse in fact. The C14 from the rings is used to calibrate
the C14 curve.
Eric Stevens
- Next message: Eric Stevens: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Previous message: Eric Stevens: "Re: Scholarly dishonesty - Re: The Bat Creek Stone Revisited"
- In reply to: Alan M Dunsmuir: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Next in thread: Kendall K. Down: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Reply: Kendall K. Down: "Re: Egyptian Chronology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|