Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs

From: Franz Gnaedinger (frgn_at_bluemail.ch)
Date: 11/20/04 

Date: 19 Nov 2004 23:46:58 -0800

frgn@bluemail.ch (Franz Gnaedinger) wrote in message news:<2bf25455.0411190130.2fe78a34@posting.google.com>...

A lesson on the Usenet, for Dr. Marcel Rochaix www.ekbt-law.ch

I give private lessons for a relief organization (for free,
although I am living most modestly - so very modestly nobody
of you would believe it and hold it as possible). Just now I
am teaching mathematics to a woman who suffers from discalculy.
We are mostly playing, calculating without actually calculating,
thus developing new ways of learning and teaching mathematics.
The local universities recognize no necessity for such new ways,
despite the drastic decline of the Swiss public schools. But
my relief organization does, and encourages me. The woman I am
teaching now is eagerly participating, and although she goes

   twelve minus one equals one

she knows more about mathematics than Dr.iur. Marcel Rochaix,
expert on computer law in Europe, knows about the Usenet.

If he published his indictment paper against me online, people
would ROFL (any idea what that means, Dr. Marcel Rochaix?) and
call him a KOOK (you know what _that_ means, at least in terms
of money) for having not the faintest notion of the Usenet,
and a rather dubious one on the Web (taking 18,700 entries on
the Phaistos Disk for as many articles by as many authors).

If Dr. Marcel Rochaix weren't up to ruin my bare existence
I had pity for him, and if he should believe to be the lawyer
of a honorable scholar, professional mathematician and member
of the Linguistic Society of Paris, not knowing that he actually
supports grapheus - well, in that case I already pity him, and
for free. Picture yourself as a hopeful and still relatively
young lawyer, expert on computer law in Europe. Would you like
to bust your career by becoming the lawyer of grapheus?

Well, I better give Dr. Rochaix a lesson on the Usenet.

The Usenet is an open medium. Everybody can publish in the
unmoderated scientific groups and participate in the ensuing
discussions. However, that freedom has a price: one has to fight
if one comes up with new ideas, insights, approaches, theses,
or even theories (if a thesis can be compared with a piece of
wood, a theory would correspond to a piece of furniture; theses
and theories are often confounded, even by edus).

The Usenet is the Wild Wild West sector of the World Wide Web.
People are continually shooting at each other, and the most
priceworthy bullet available is the word kook. Almost everybody
in the Usenet has been called a kook, and not just once.

You, Dr. Marcel Rochaix, are quoting the Webster's definition
of a kook. As a lawyer you are doing a lot of talking, I guess,
and should therefore know some basic laws of semantics. For
example this one: the meaning of a word is defined by the usage
of that word, and the usage of a word can largely depend on
the given context. Calling somebody a kook in the Usenet is not
at all the same as calling a scholar a kook in a prestigious
journal.

And anyway, summoning the law is a bad way of handling a conflict
in the Usenet, which, I say it again, is a free and open medium.
The good way of handling a conflict in the Usenet is by replying
and giving back and correcting mistakes and uncovering lies of
an adversary. If someone does you wrong you can give back, even
shoot back with words, if necessary, and you are in the moral
right, the more so the more unjust an attack on you has been.
The magic term here is self-regulation. You can't rule the
Usenet from the outside, and certainly not if you know nothing
about it. If you try nevertheless you must be man enough to
stand the colorful names you are called for doing so.

The Usenet is an easily accessible, pluridisciplinary facility
for publishing, discussing and further developing new ideas.
A fantastic medium, however, much and often and grossly abused.
One of those who makes abuse of several groups is grapheus,
beyond any reasonable doubt identical with your client Marie
Jean Faucounau. If you, Dr.iur. Marcel Rochaix, know a different
Jean Faucounau than we do, please tell us about him, and explain
why you cover grapheus, an exemplary spammer and molestor, whose
anonymized e-mail address made it on a Google list for spamming
and harassing.

   Franz Gnaedinger www.seshat.ch

> Peter T. Daniels: telling my readers not to laught and then
> mentioning Pamela Anderson was an ironic double bind reflecting
> the double binds I am caught in. Dr. Marcel Rochaix behaved
> toward me as if he were a mediator, and on the following morning
> I got his vitriolic paper sent to me by the court. Rochaix said
> he highly estimates me as a scientist, which is a fine reason
> for shattering my existence. He spoke of a "silly case" but
> wrote his paper molto con brio. He regrets the end of the Age
> of Enlightment, what with Giscard d'Estaing and Chirac ruling,
> however, Rochaix himself is heading backward to the cabinet
> justice of the Ancien Régime by conceiling the true name of
> my long-time stalker grapheus.
>
> Eberle Kämpfen Bösiger Theiler www.ekbt-law.ch are based in
> the Jewish quarter of Zurich but accuse me in the context of
> my 2000/2001 activity in debunking Juergen Spanuth, a former
> SS member who tried to keep Nazi archaeology virulent in the
> post-war era and succeeded in fooling almost everyone by his
> polished writing. Nazi archaeology believed that the ancient
> Greeks had been Germans, which is why the Wehrmacht acted more
> brutally in Greece and Crete than anywhere else. The cradle of
> western civilization was theirs; and all of Europe was theirs,
> for Europe is the heir of the Greek civilization. The German
> proto-Greeks wandered down the river Danube, while Faucounau's
> mysterious proto-Ionians came from the lower Danube basin. A
> perfect match. Moreover, the proto-Ionian king, famed by a psalm
> on the Phaistos Disk, sacker of cities who left "nothing but
> ashes and chicken nests," was called Aryon. Does that ring a bell?
> Aryon Aryans? No wonder Harald Henkel, fervent admirer of Juergen
> Spanuth, embraced grapheus, and this one was mighty pleased to
> get such support.
>
> Now for the glorious calculation on page 6 of Rochaix's paper.
> 18,700 web entries on the Phaistos Disk represent 18,700 articles
> by 18,700 authors, a large majority of whom buy the books by
> each other ...
>
> Let me go on in that gaudy way. Each of the 18,700 authors would
> have 18,699 colleagues or rivals. A large majority of the 18,700
> authors may be 15,000 authors, while the average prize for a
> book on the Phaistos Disk may be some 40 euro. Multiply these
> numbers and you obtain a phenomenal Phaistos Disk book market
> volume of 15,000 x 18,699 x 40 = 11,219,400,000 euro.
>
> Furthermore, 18,700 authors who have 18,699 potential rivals
> generate 18,700 x 18,699 x 1/2 = 174,835,650 potential lawsuits,
> and if a lawyer can charge 10,000 euro in such a case, and since
> each lawsuit requires a lawyer on each side, we are looking at
> a gold mine of 17,835,650 x 10,000 x 2 = 3,496,713,000,000 euro.
> The future is bright for Eberle Kämpfen Bösiger Theiler ...
>
> Dr. Marcel Rochaix confessed to me not being very good at
> calculating, and this, combined with the creative solutions
> promised on www.ekbt-law.ch, may have resulted in the curious
> calculation on page 6 of Rochaix's paper. However, the vision
> of an army of Phaistos Disk authors rather has the smell of
> "ashes and chicken nests" and makes me ponder another scenario:
> What if Jean Faucounau grapheus, invoking the authority of the
> Linguistic Society of Paris, asked ekbt-law Paris to wrap his
> figures up into legal paragraphs, whereupon Paris handed the
> hot potato over to Zurich, where Rochaix was ordered to handle
> that "silly case"? A legal form of playing Russian roulette:
> bust or bust or bust or bust or boost or bust your career by
> becoming the lawyer of Jean Faucounau grapheus ... I recognize
> a couple of graphean replies to me in Rochaix's paper, and the
> vitriol might come from the same source. Can I then rehabilitate
> Dr. Marcel Rochaix? - I am really caught in a series of double
> binds set up by the dual personality Jean Faucounau grapheus.
>
>
> Next time: giving a lesson on the Usenet, for Rochaix et al.
>
> Franz Gnaedinger www.seshat.ch

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs
    ... A lesson on the Usenet, for Dr. Marcel Rochaix www.ekbt-law.ch ... and if he should believe to be the lawyer ... to bust your career by becoming the lawyer of grapheus? ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ring a bell to you ?
    ... If as grapheus says, time and time ... >That was long before the UseNet existed. ... >Idiots belong in killfiles, there is no other effective way to ... What was then so fascinating about the disc inscription? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Ring a bell to you ?
    ... If as grapheus says, time and time ... >That was long before the UseNet existed. ... >Idiots belong in killfiles, there is no other effective way to ... What was then so fascinating about the disc inscription? ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs
    ... are sued by a Marie Jean Marcel grapheus Rochaix Faucounau ... showed up in the Usenet. ... Jean Faucounau for a year. ... material into books and articles, he would have published them, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs
    ... are sued by a Marie Jean Marcel grapheus Rochaix Faucounau ... showed up in the Usenet. ... Jean Faucounau for a year. ... material into books and articles, he would have published them, ...
    (sci.archaeology)