Re: a question for inger

From: David B (tronospamchos_at_tesco.net)
Date: 11/20/04 

Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:41:39 GMT

Eric Stevens wrote in message ...
>
>That they were supposed to be secret may be true but in fact, if what
>Inger has told us is correct, the best you could say is that they were
>very little known. While the fact of their existence may deal with one
>question (of how the forgers knew of them but the 'experts' seemed not
>to) it raises another. Why is it that *none* of the experts claimed
>to recognise the runes?

Or to look at it another way, why is it that although none of the experts
claimed to recognise the runes, a basically accurate transliteration was
made within months of the discovery?

>Now you have to find some
>facts to fit in with the hypothesis.

Yes, and if anybody pays me several thousand dollars to travel to
Scandinavia and the USA, I probably will.

David B.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: a question for inger
    ... >>That they were supposed to be secret may be true but in fact, ... >>Inger has told us is correct, the best you could say is that they were ... >claimed to recognise the runes, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: a question for inger
    ... >>Inger has told us is correct, the best you could say is that they were ... > claimed to recognise the runes, ... I am most curious about the first experts who looked at the KRS, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote: q95mq1thvudaifibbmicj26vs75slvssrq@xxxxxxx, ... >>> (That is not an English speciality) ... >>> to find the secret dots. ... The significance of the marking of some of the runes needed ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... But Inger, they weren't - how many times do you have to be told? ... > those who claim that there isn't any documentation for some of the 'runes' ... instructed them to be carved) on that stone, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Norse, Vatican and Vinland
    ... > Inger E Johansson wrote: ... Professor Knirk might be correct in one way, ... > further investigation to scorn the KRS. ... > current commonly used runes - it is quite obvious that isn't so. ...
    (sci.archaeology)