Re: Marie Jean Faucounau sues me for at least 8,487 Swiss Francs

From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 11/28/04 

Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:34:25 -0800

Rolleston wrote:

> Take a gander at this:
>
> "http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3t0800pg1a80hm34p28fd21q3kubhh02aa%404ax.com"

Interesting, isn't it?

JF> b)- they are based upon mathematical notions which are generally not
JF> teached
JF> in the Universities

Kept out by the Establishment, I presume.

> like the concept that "probability is function of
JF> knowledge"

That is obvious. The outcome of the next spin of the roulette
wheel is unpredictable because we don't have the knowledge
of the state of the wheel. They don't teach that 1*n = n in
universities either.

> or like the properties of the "generalized Markov's chains",
JF> etc.

Tiens donc... never mind that I don't see what transition
tables might have to do with decipherment, I just asked
Google for "generalized markov chains" _verbatim_ and I
got 26 hits.

And just "markov chains" got me there:

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain"

Nothing mysterious there. Take a look. Even if the
formulas look daunting to you, there is no mystery.
Just go to the examples:

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examples_of_Markov_chains"

JF> So, to explain them, I need to write a 300 page book.

Now you know! Sornettes et compagnie.

> Add to that that
JF> c)- I have lost most of my 1970-1975 calculations when I moved from
the
JF> USA some fifteen years ago

Just like Churchward and the owl-shaped vase from Mu.

JF> d)- that in all cases the method being of probabilistic nature,
JF> publishing
JF> it will *prove* nothing ( Probability is not certainty !)

That is like saying that there can be no proof for Gauss's
formula for the area under the normal curve because it is of
probabilistic nature. Stuff and nonsense.

You have there all the hallmarks of a kook. Kookus Falcolnalis
mirificus.